Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Adrian with brass shield


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Adrian with brass shield
Permalink   


Lately I have seen a French Adrian with a brass shield on the peak. It had an inscription "soldat de la grande guerre" and I was told by the owner of the helmet that French veterans were allowed to wear these, being on memorial parades.
Can anyone confirm that, or tell me more?

Kieffer

__________________


Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Kieffer,

this is correct, the 18th of december 1918, France being thankfull to her soldier allowed for each of them an helmet with this brass shield on it.
Famillies of deceased soldiers were also suposed to get one.
It seems that only officiers had their names written on it.

Best regards,
Paul

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

How interesting!

Here's one d'un sapeur du génie http://24.img.v4.skyrock.net/24f/francaisww1/pics/2171806279_1.jpg (http://francaisww1.skyrock.com/)

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Paullux,

thanks for your reaction!

unfortunately I don't have a picture, the helmet is with a friend a few miles away. When I am near, I will make a photo of it. There was a name, but scratched under in the steel of the peak, like many soldiers do.
Heard too that these vets got the first drink for free when visiting the cafe...well at least they deserved that!
Amazing how small this helmet is...were there different sizes?
What function had that aluminium inside?
Under the topic "Gaede helmet again" I posted a picture of an Adrian, decorated by a poilu to mock or make some fun, did you see it?

regards, Kieffer

__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Yep, that's the one!

regards, Kieffer

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi kieffer i do believe the french produced the Adrian in at least 3 different sizes, although I coldnt tell you what these actually were but probarbly a fairly standard small, medium and large.... there may be a marking on the inside...


French Adrian helmet site

Cheerssmile

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Kieffer and Rectalgia,
i m gathering as much info as i can with the help from some friends collecting French items as i don t know much about them !
Great pics on the Gaede topic !
Thank you Ironsides for the link !

Best regards !
Paul

__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Ironsides,

thanks for the lead! There were three sizes as I see, one would presume that helmets were all the same size. So I am relieved that the question wasn't that dummy..
Sizes anyhow, people were smaller then. Uniforms exhibited in museums look (even in pristine condition) so small and fragile, seeing the things in real it's almost a touching experience. And their shoes, was their ever any army who gave it's soldiers proper ones?

regards, Kieffer



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

Indeed, thanks Ironsides.

To bring that size information here directly -

The helmet is available in three sizes of steel shells, each size shell could receive three cap sizes (54 to 56 for A, 57 to 59 for B and 60 to 62 for C).
So, in inch sizes (which are diameter, not circumference) the extremes are 63/4 to 73/4 which spans today's range from between "X-Small" and "Small" to between "X-Large" and "XX-Large" - so I think it matches today's population closely (my size is 57-58). 

The height of European men has changed substantially since the Great War. Accounts then often mentioned that the "colonials" stood head and shoulders over their European comrades.  And, even there, average height has increased too (though not as much as weight - that must be the square-cube scaling thing biggrin).  But hat size has  not changed appreciably in that time, it seems.  Maybe they wore more hair then - poilu indeed, but I thought before that referred to the moustache hmm.

As for footware - well Shaka Zulu banned footware entirely in his regiments (ibutho/impi) and any who objected were executed on the spot, it is said (they saw the point - of an iklwa) so things could be worse when talking of army boots and shoes.  Besides, swapping boots and complaining about them is a great diversion for troops and a source of endless amusement for Quartermasters since time out of mind.

An old episode of Antiques Roadshow I saw recently reminded me of the old saying/observation from Lancaster "There's nowt so comfortable as clogs." (nowt = "nothing", near enough)  A virtue made of necessity - or did footware take a wrong turning a few generations ago?  Not that I can see a military application unless cows were in short supply - though the "Change ... step!" for a clog-shod company on the march over a paved surface would rattle windows and impress bystanders enormously.

-- Edited by Rectalgia on Wednesday 24th of February 2010 05:07:33 AM

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Rectalgia,

yes, men are taller today. One of the statistics comes right from the military, the medical records from recruits who are measured when drafted. Nutrition or malnutrition was a key factor. Military service was often the first occasion were men got enough to eat, and for instance the French army food was not that bad at all, at least in pre war times.
Well, clogs are comfortable! You wouldn't say that by seeing. It takes a few days to get used to them, the beginning is a bit harsh. Apart from being a cheap footwear they are dry and even warm too in wet soil. Belgian "piotten" at the beginning of the Yser episode were short on everything, shoes too, and they wear often clogs.But you're right, running and marching is an other matter than standing relatively still in a trench.

regards,
Kieffer




__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi, well there Clogs and theres clogs, the name of course refers to wooden footwear and most would probarbly assume an all wooden shoe somewhat like the dutch clog....
Clogs have been around since the Ark literally and often take the form of wooden soled shoes with leather uppers, northern clogs are this type....
These are still made today at Walkely Clogs in Hebden Bridge I visited some decades ago as it tied in with long term interest in ancient footwear, they take a bit of getting used too but otherwise you can think of them as ordinary shoes....

heres the link may be usefull for some reinactors....

http://www.clogs.co.uk/

Thers also a Clog maker in Oldenburg who makes these (see pic) which are the traditional type for the region Ive seen similar ones worn by french soldiers..... sometimes these had leather uppers attached as well...

Cheerssmile



-- Edited by Ironsides on Wednesday 24th of February 2010 11:56:00 AM

Attachments
__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Ironsides,

yes, clogs are mostly connected to the Dutch type, you always see on folkloristic pictures and so on, they are painted and decorated too. They are called "klomp" or klompen in plural, in Dutch.
Normally they are just plain and unpainted, and the type were the instep is more open is indeed another.
As many privates were "country boys" I think they were already used to wear them.
Nice 'klompen"picture you posted there! Did the local marten pay a visit?
Might be an idea to start a topic on  wwI military footwear?

best regards, Kieffer




__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   


Hi Kieffer this may interest handmade hobnails for the Austrian Army......

http://www.vallediledro.com/lang/EN/pagine/dettaglio/7/51.html


the ferret is fanny short for little orphan Annie she was a rescued ferret, she died a few years ago a very cute little thing she was very clever and could operate switches.....
We bought her an electronic dog you had to press the paw to make it work she would play with it for hours, but after a while the novelty of hearing "How much is that doggy in the window" wore off..... for us not for her....

Cheerssmile


-- Edited by Ironsides on Thursday 25th of February 2010 04:07:20 AM

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Ironsides,

I meant to comment on the "ferret accessory", glad I didn't make light of it now.  I had an uncle who kept a few ferrets, when times were hard.  Got me thinking though, about the opportunities for food foraging during WW1 (ferrets being used so much in past days for "rabbiting" as my uncle did), no chance of course at the front but I find no reference to it other areas either.

But there are plenty of references to army rations, the re-enactors replica supplies, etc. like http://www.tommyspackfillers.com/gallery/gallery.php?page=0 (British).

That site has an extensive section on grenades too. Good heavens, the 36 grenade was used in WW1! I had imagined the "36" stood for 1936. I used those (on a range) two generations and more later. Instructors joked (I hope they were joking) when we prepared the things to be sure we had the right fuse (4 or 7 sec, I forget, there were both, colour white maybe is the one we used) not orange (that colour I remember) which was "Fuse, Instantaneous".

There was such (orange) fuse I have used it. It is for booby traps. It is fast-burning (just under 100 ft/sec), not to be confused with the cordex/detcord/primacord as many do (that stuff is HE and more like 7-8 km/s - and WW2 and after). The orange fuse could be used with a grenade for a booby trap I suppose but the cap, fuse and detonator are usually a pre-made assembly. I wonder if "instantaneous" grenade fuse sets were actually made and issued? It seems unlikely to me but the exigencies of war ... certainly a simple and effective booby trap but the risk of mixing... Bad enough with 4 and 7 second fuses (the latter for EY rifle grenade projector use and maybe training).

Anyway, that is all far from the Adrian with a commemorative plate, far even from footwear and the non-combatant ferret. But for fine detail in dioramas and such, the pictures in the link might be interesting.


-- Edited by Rectalgia on Saturday 27th of February 2010 06:34:53 AM

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

Hi all,

to push matters slowly back direction topic..via food: a picture of a German mobile drinking water installation, making undrinkable drinkable. It's from an old magazine dated 1914.
The caption only says that Germans are disinfecting dirty water.

regards, Kieffer

Attachments
__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

another feeding item, a German mobile bakery

Kieffer

Attachments
__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 730
Date:
Permalink   

back to shoes...Belgian soldiers selecting shoes, in 1916 Oostvleteren.

Kieffer

Attachments
__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 197
Date:
RE: Adrian with brass shield - regards "Fuse, Instantaneous"
Permalink   


Yes "instantaneous" grenade fuse sets were actually made and issued were made & issued, they were also distinctly coloured orange. The greatest use of them that I have read about was in the Far East, but that I believe is an artefact of what I was reading. I know some were "intentionally lost" to the insugents in Malya in the 50's.

I recall a training exercise where these were "substituted" into training grenades to make a point! The result was a great deal of paranioa! We all got damed good at "disassembly" to check! That was when I was a Cadet bloody near 65 years since the no.36 was 1st introduced! But then my 1st training rifle had pre 1900 proof stamps on some parts!

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
RE: Adrian with brass shield
Permalink   


Orange "instantaneous" fuse sets. Ah, that answers that then. Intended, I think, for the old jam-tin trap but yes, maybe also as a sneaky "leave behind" for the bad guys to (maybe) get caught out thereby trying to use them as grenades (with base plugs suitably tightened with a wrench to discourage checking). BUT (I must emphasise) that only works once, then the rest can be put to their intended use by those same bad guys. That's the thing about UXO of any type - it often comes back to bite, it is enough of a risk with properly deployed booby traps and mines without giving it away as a gift to those most likely to use it 'well'.

Training rifles. In my cadet days they were .303s permanently converted with the Morris tube to 22LR. They may well have been old MLEs, we hardly used them (only for 'remedial' training if I recall correctly). Generally it was straight on to the .303 SMLE No 1 Mk III*. Some of those might have been converted Mk IIIs but not likely in Aus service. Certainly many of them had early WW1 date stamps. It was sheer bliss to get something with a 1942 stamp (the most recent date I can recall). We were lucky we weren't lumbered with the .310 Martini Cadet rifles I suppose. We were still trained to clean the bores with boiling water. Just in case we came across any Mk1 blackpowder cartridges I guess (joking, it was something to do with corrosive primers I'm sure). But I have to say the SMLE was a bit much for some of the smaller lads amongst us. Some were barely 7 stone (98 lb).

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard