"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Brilliant - will this be the first book in English focusing on French WW1 Tanks?
Nope - the AJ Press book on the Schneider and St Chamond published in 2008 in Polish/English would seem to have precedence. This book is a pretty comprehensive study of the two earliest french tanks.
Brilliant - will this be the first book in English focusing on French WW1 Tanks?
Unless you count the old Profile Publications, but they're about 40 years old now and the info is very outdated.
The FT Fascine Carrier and Bridgelayer were post-war experiments.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
James H wrote:The FT Fascine Carrier and Bridgelayer were post-war experiments.
Sorry, that was meant to be in another post altogether. I wondered where it had got to. How did that happen?
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
