Hundleby and Starheim point out in their A7V book that German soldiers were paid for items scavenged from the battlefield. Copper scrap was particularly valued. These guys may have been supplementing their pay.
Ha! I've finished reading The man who bought a navy - the biography of Ernest Cox (of Cox and Danks) who bought, and subsequently raised, the German High Seas Fleet scuttled at Scapa Flow, including the 28,000 ton Hindenburg.
souvenirs and salvage: 36th Ulsters are 're enacting' their victory after the mining operation at Mesen 7th june 1917. The text on the second picture speaks for itself I think.
-- Edited by kieffer on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 08:57:33 PM
Ha! I've finished reading The man who bought a navy - the biography of Ernest Cox (of Cox and Danks) who bought, and subsequently raised, the German High Seas Fleet scuttled at Scapa Flow, including the 28,000 ton Hindenburg.
There was some wonderful amateur footage of ships being salvaged at Scapa Flow on one edition of the recent BBC home movie show. May be available on iPlayer.
The first tank seems to me to be a Mark IV Male rather than a supply tank. The tank in the foreground of the second photo is a Mark IV Male, that in the background a Mark IV Female. The general state of the battlefield suggests the aftermath of Third Ypres but I don't recognise these tanks as appearing in other photos. I can't (yet) identify any of the tanks pictured. Thanks for posting them.
Gwyn Evans wrote: There was some wonderful amateur footage of ships being salvaged at Scapa Flow on one edition of the recent BBC home movie show. May be available on iPlayer.
Gwyn
Yes, I saw that. Marvellous footage it was. I mentioned it to my father who turned round and said, "I've the book here". Like father like son...
The first tank seems to me to be a Mark IV Male rather than a supply tank....
Is there any identifying feature which you base that on, Gwyn? I thought it was a supply tank mostly due to the sponson door, which has the plain bottom section. Another feature is the plain finish of the angled panel on the sponson side. It's hard to be sure but there don't appear to be rivets toward the front, which should be there on a male sponson. Also, there is a small bar above the rear of the stores box. This is something I have not seen on male tanks but does appear on supply tanks. The interior of the tank has the ammo rack layout of a male body but I don't know what the layout was for a supply tank.
Thanks for the feedback guys. Of the question whether or not the tank in the first picture is a supply tank - my 'call' was based on comparisons with others in the usual online and printed media references. It's far from coming from an authoritative position. British armour isn't one of my strengths.
Mark, your assessment convinced me to run with my original analysis. A red letter day for me :)
I certainly do not claim to have any knowledge of these tanks.(Well I have more now.) But I am glad you Gents, and Ladies do, and this forum even exists. My link interest of course to WW1 is my Grandfather. He served with the 184 Battalion CEF, or I should say he mustered under them, but served under others in France during his time there.
Picture #two, the fellow in the upper hatch is holding quite a good sized wrench. Perhaps the term for that is spanner.
Picture one, just curiouse, what might be the object near out of the pictue just below the right track? Two cylinders appear to be attached. And also, by the right boot of the man just behind the tank? Odd shaped canister.
Strange cylinder in the lower right corner.
Also there seems to be a lot of paper debris scattered. This would indicate to me that the contents of the vehicle had been stripped for information. May also be an indication that German forces had a good supply of toilet paper. If they were short, you probably would not see one scrap on the ground for paper would be worth something. (Even if the ink was harsh on the intended new target).
These questions may not be of importance but knowing what these men may have had can help indicate how they lived, worked and functioned. Again, I was just curiouse.
Just so we don't start off on the same subject again, the interior photo I posted is one found in a set of photos of a Mark IV Tender at Biggin Hill on the AWM website. I only know it's a Tender because it's in that set.
Yes, it's hard to read! This caused me some puzzlement but I was helped when I found that in amongst my extensive collection of photos of tanks I can't identify was another of this tank, but taken from the other side. That didn't reveal any serial at all, nor any other markings, but it had a place - Peronne - and a date - May 1918. That seemed to rule out 2309, which to the best of my knowledge was lost in Flanders in August 1917. My identification of the tank is still somewhat tentative, but I believe it's 2303. This was a 4th Battalion tank, abandoned after developing engine trouble on 23 March 1918.
The small bar above the rear of the stowage box is certainly a common feature on Tenders, but it's not unique to them. Here's a Male with such a bar.
Gwyn
Yes, I shall have myself a slice of humble pie on that one and a side order of better glasses, as the bar appears on many Mk IV's, male and female as well as supply. It seems that there are at least 2 different patterns to the unditching rails and the bar is very common on the one with the extra supports in the stores box.