Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Philippines Army Operated Renault FTs?


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Philippines Army Operated Renault FTs?
Permalink   


That's the claim being made on an online encyclopaedia.

If I understand this bit of history correctly, I find it hard to believe. It seems to me that: Philippines were under U.S. control for early part of 20th century; independent army established only after WWII; tanks deployed by U.S. in Philippines more likely to be M1917s.

Anyone know better?



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

Since the FT & M1917s look similar, I'd be unsurprised if the two were confused.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Hi James, from what I can see the claim is for one tank used for training purposes prior to US involvement in WW2, could be an FT but more likely a US built  M1917.... dont know of any pics though....

" The lone tank was used by the 1st Regular Division, Philippine Army in their infantry training at Camp Murphy (now Camp Aguinaldo) sometime from 1936 to 1940. "

from http://www.lightarmordivision.net.ph/1starmor.htm

Cheerssmile



__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Ta, Ivor. Interesting site. On this page there's a badge showing what looks more like an FT than an M1917, but who knows how that came about? I lean towards the idea of it being an M1917. Wonder where the info came from and if there's any other evidence?



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

1936? Perhaps the Japanese snuck it in under the guise of the Greater Asian Co-prosperity Sphere. Even then, the USA would have had something to say about that, but who knows?

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard