Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: "flying tank"


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 154
Date:
"flying tank"
Permalink   


Photomontage of a "flying tank" from the year 1932. I realize that this is a political photomontage as anti-war propaganda. Probably comes the collage by John Heartfield.

But now to my question, which is apparently used for this a tank of the British Mark-series. Is it provided a real role model, i.e. this is someone running the tank (of course without a plane) known?

 



Attachments
__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

It's neither a real tank, nor a real plane.
It's just a drawing, the tank bears a passing resemblance to a British WW1 tank, the plane a slight resemblance to a German 1930s one.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Theres allways the Christie Flying Tank ....

http://www.roadabletimes.com/roadables-modular_Christie.html

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/flying-tanks-that-shed-their-wings/

Cheerssmile



-- Edited by Ironsides on Wednesday 3rd of October 2012 08:13:30 AM

__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 



Corporal

Status: Offline
Posts: 19
Date:
Permalink   

I know that the Soviets tested similar things from the 30s up to WW2. The Antonov A-40 in 1942 300px-AntonovA40.jpg and in the 30s they put T27 tankettes on the bottom of bombers. 220px-T-27_tb-3.jpg



Attachments
__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

Hedi wrote:

... Is it provided a real role model, i.e. this is someone running the tank (of course without a plane) known?


No, I don't think so. The tank in your picture looks a little bit like a Mark IX, but not enough to convince me.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

A Mk IX with sponsons?



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

James H wrote:

A Mk IX with sponsons?


Yes. A Mk IX with sponsons.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Ah. Right.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard