Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The K-Wagen - More Dubious Wikipedia Goings-on.


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
The K-Wagen - More Dubious Wikipedia Goings-on.
Permalink   


Sturmpanzerwagen A7V: Vom Urpanzer zum Leopard 2 pub. Bernard U. Graefe Verlag (Nov 2003), a German language book, renders it thus:

Der Groß-kampfwagen (K-Wagen) p.312

I've not seen it referred to as G.K.-Wagen, but that means naff-all.

Oddly enough, the German wiki page refers to it as Kolossal-Wagen and cites only one source:

Wolfgang Schneider und Rainer Strasheim: Waffen-Arsenal Band 112 Deutsche Kampfwagen im 1. Weltkrieg, Podzun-Pallas Verlag GmbH, 1988

I've checked this book (I have the English edition and also a downloaded scan of the original German) and nowhere does it refer to 'Kolossal-Wagen', as far as I can see anyway.

References to a wooden mockup apparently built for Hitler in 1942 don't make much sense. If, as I've read somewhere on the web, it was to compare with the Maus, well, the wooden mockup for that wasn't presented to Hitler until May 1943 - Heinz Guderian apparently mentions it in his autobiography, but makes no mention of a K-Wagen mockup (at least not in the excerpt quoted):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_VIII_Maus

Turns out a bunch of us discussed the name K-Wagen here back in 2006, when I wrote:

Many years ago, David Fletcher sent me some photocopies (very poor quality, due solely to the poor nature of the copies he himself had, not any deficiency on his part!) in which one sheet labels it, on the same page, as 'Deutscher Grosskampfwagen' and 'Deutscher K-Wagen', which may support an account I've read that says that 'K-Wagen' simply means 'Kampfwagen', the 'gross' perhaps being dropped from the acronym for security reasons. Of course, 'colossal' in English does translate into 'Kolossal' in German, so who can say, it may have had a double meaning...

So, not much has moved on since then...



-- Edited by Roger Todd on Wednesday 12th of December 2012 05:30:36 PM

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Have just been looking at different Wikipedia versions, as they are not necessarily just translations of each other. The Dutch article is of interest (whether accurate or not I cannot comment).

According to Dutch wiki, the vehicle was initially termed GK-Wagen, but the "G" was dropped when one of the firms involved, Wegmann, pointed out that there was a railway wagon called K-Wagen; so they say it was changed quickly from GK-Wagen to K-Wagen as a subterfuge.

Re wooden mockups, I've heard that Hitler ordered one for comparison, but cannot remember where I read so. Dutch wiki reiterates this suggestion. I would point out that Maus was not the only German super-heavy tank project, so it is feasible that a mockup may have been ordered before the Maus mockup was presented. There was apparently a proper "land battleship" project circa 1942, for a 1000 tonne machine to have been propelled by marine diesels. English wiki says that Speer cancelled that project in '42, IIRC.

Incidentally, the Dutch wiki article (which is more wordy than the English and German equivalents) claims that there was a lot of propaganda in Germany against tanks during WW1, the reasoning being that Germany didn't really have the resources available to build them, but could see that they had a positive effect on British morale.

It says that a German tank would therefore have to be better (in armour, etc) than British tanks in order that propaganda could portray British tanks as ineffective, but German ones as good. So the suggestion made is that K-Wagen was more of a huge (literally!) propaganda stunt, and that there were protests against it, hoping that it would just be used for propaganda and never used in combat.

What the "K" stands for is, according to the article, unknown - it says suggestions such as "Kolossal" are just hypothetical.

Some figures are quoted, including that it would carry about 21000 rounds of MG ammo, carry 3000 litres of fuel, and that the later choice of engines (650hp) was to be Daimler units for submarines, but there are no references listed for the article.



-- Edited by TinCanTadpole on Wednesday 12th of December 2012 07:08:17 PM

__________________


Legend

Status: Online
Posts: 3879
Date:
Permalink   

Quite a lot of this is at variance with my understanding of the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-Wagen Pretty confident that K-Wagen is not short for G.K.-Wagen at all. Doesn't make grammatical sense. It would Grosser Kampfwagen. Can anyone confirm that it stands for "Kolossal"? Hitler ordered wooden mock-up? I should very much like to see the source of that theory. Sources: Can't definitely recall seeing Christopher Foss's book, but I think it has been found to be rather shaky in the past. Has anyone any experience of this book? However, I know for a fact that "German Panzers 1914-18" wasn't written by Eric Bass.

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Indeed there were numerous super-heavy tank projects (the E100 being the most notable apart from the Maus, for example) but Ratte (the 1000-tonner) was barely a 'project', having got no further than a few 'preliminary drawings' (even according to Wiki, which can be prone to exaggeration) by the end of 1942. Interestingly, Engineer Grote, the brains behind the Ratte, had been 'loaned' to the Soviets during the period of German-Russian cooperation, and had designed this sleek beastie for them:

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/73148-grote-prototype-tank/

Grote also proposed this monster 1000-ton tank for the Soviets as well:

http://bronetehnika.narod.ru/tg/tg_10.jpg

It's suspiciously similar to the latter Ratte, suggesting that he never quite got the thousand-ton tank out of his system...

I'm sceptical about the 'wooden K-Wagen mockup built for Hitler' as all the references I've seen on the web are strikingly similar in wording to each other, suggesting that they're all parroting from one source, which is conveniently never cited. Consequently, until I see reputable evidence I don't believe a word of it.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Okay, does the unreferenced Dutch wiki suggestion for the GK-Wagen to K-Wagen change (if it happened) sound plausible to you? It does to me, but as I said, no references are quoted.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

It sounds plausible, but as you say there's no corroborative evidence, so as to its veracity, who can say at this moment in time?



__________________


Legend

Status: Online
Posts: 3879
Date:
Permalink   

Well, the Dutch Wikipedia article is fascinating but offers not one source or reference. Unless the author made the whole thing up for the purposes of the article, the info must have come from somewhere. But where?

Anyway, at the moment, a very distant bell is ringing. Somewhere, possibly in Jeudy's Chars de France, there's an attempt to make some sort of link between the K-Wagen and the French FCM F1 of 1940:  http://www.chars-francais.net/new/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=723&Itemid=36 Something about a plan of the K-Wagen but with captions in French, and a suggestion that the K-Wagen inspired the FCM F1. Obviously, could be a complete red herring.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

It's not in Jeudy, can't find anything about the K-Wagen to link it with the FCM F1. Frankly I'd be surprised as the FCM F1 is very definitely French in conception and engineering, there's a very clear lineage with other French vehicles, and I can't see anything about the K-Wagen that would serve as an influence.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

I've just looked at "German Tanks and Armoured Vehicles 1914-1945" by BT White: no mention of a GK-Wagen, nor of what the "K" might stand for. It does, interestingly, say that locomotive springs were used between hull and track frames, and that the track rollers were attached to the track links rather than the hull.

No mention either of wooden mockups, either in the K-Wagen article, the Maus article, or the general overview towards the beginning of the book.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

TinCanTadpole wrote:

I've just looked at "German Tanks and Armoured Vehicles 1914-1945" by BT White: no mention of a GK-Wagen, nor of what the "K" might stand for. It does, interestingly, say that locomotive springs were used between hull and track frames, and that the track rollers were attached to the track links rather than the hull. 


That rings a bell, so after much arsing about searching through boxes of files, I've finally found a set of photocopies David Fletcher (bless that man!) did for me, ooh, around 20 years ago(!) of the Tank Museum's material (then, there might be more now) on the K-Wagen. There's a big drawing (a bit indistinct in places) of one of these roller-links, and another set of small schematic drawings showing how the vehicle was to be broken down into transportable sections and reassembled.



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Any hint of where these 'locomotive springs' went?

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

I finally worked up the energy to scan something...

Two versions of the sheet of schematic drawings of how it dismantles, the second with red arrows pointing at what I take to be the locomotive-type springs.



Attachments
__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for the links to the photos (though they've been doing the rounds for some years). I wouldn't accept categorically a statement made in a popular newspaper like Spiegel without a reference. Thanks also for the Hahn information. Hahn's reference to a model demonstrated to Hitler is intriguing, but not necessarily the same thing as a full-scale wooden mockup. There certainly was a model built of the K-Wagen when the full-size machine was under way - attached is a scan from a 1936 book by Ernst Volckheim that shows the model (the book was on ebay some years ago). Perhaps it survived the Great War and was shown to Hitler, or maybe a new one was built (though why?), maybe Hahn is wrong. It's certainly interesting new information but tantalisingly inconclusive.



-- Edited by Roger Todd on Friday 14th of December 2012 09:24:08 PM

Attachments
__________________
Pat


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 600
Date:
Permalink   

Regarding the Hitler bit:

Fritz Hahn has written a much-quoted book "weapons and secret weapons of the german military 1933-1945".

He writes that in October 1918 it was decided to complete only the two protoypes, at a grand total cost of 1,3 Mio Reichsmark. He also writes that Hitler "later" had a K-Wagen model demonstrated to him.

Hahn (b. 1922) claims having served with the Heereswaffenamt, gaining an excellent overview about Germany's WW2 weapons development and production. He further claims having saved many original documents from destruction in April 1945. Disturbingly I was unable to find any scientific evaluation of his writings.

Now for the name, and photos:

Spiegel magazine, not known as a prime source for historical information, shows this K-Wagen production line photo, saying the K was for Kolossal (as do all popular publications re: this tank I found):

http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/entry/angriff_der_kreiselpanzer/13902/der_150_tonnen_prototyp.html?o=position-ASCENDING&s=0&r=48&a=1970&of=21&c=1

Another image, courtesy of the Axis History Forum:

http://i44.tinypic.com/2ew1ul1.jpg



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Re Spiegel, the horsepower figure quoted is the early one of 200hp, and the 150 tonnes is an early figure too, before the design was shortened and reduced to a more reasonable 120 tonnes.

__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 656
Date:
Permalink   

When K-Wagen production was decided upon in June 1917, the Büssing company got the job of drawing the construction plans and furnishing a mobile model in 1 : 20 scale.

In the 1930ies, inspection Waffen Prüfung 6 of the Heereswaffenamt was in possession of a K-Wagen model. However, it's not clear whether that was the one made by Büssing.



-- Edited by mad zeppelin on Saturday 15th of December 2012 02:01:53 PM

__________________
MZ
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard