Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New photo of a Mk?


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
New photo of a Mk?
Permalink   


http://www.wlhg.co.uk/monthly_photos2009.htm

Interesting caption (It's the January photo)

"This was a sneaked photograph of the new 'tank', taken as it was being shipped by train from Lincoln during the Great War"



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Not sure about 'new' Tank in terms of when it was taken compared to the first appearance of the tanks as appears to be a Mk IV Male with the sponson pushed in

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

It does appear to be a Mk IV, definitely a male and not a supply tank. I do note, however, that the stowage box is missing from the rear roof panel; were late Mk IIIs given the external fuel tank? I don't recall at present exactly whether or not I have read that the last Mk IIIs were so fitted - anyone else know if it could be a late III?

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1416
Date:
Permalink   

It's a Mark IV. Mark IIIs don't have exhausts, or external fuel tanks.

Excellent photo though, very interesting.

Gwyn

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

I know Mk IIIs don't have these things, but since they did gain new sponson designs mid-production, I was unsure whether I had read that very late examples were virtually Mk IVs, because of new bits being introduced bit by bit into the production line. It's new to me to see a IV with no stowage box on the roof - could it have been missing from the first examples?
Also, have just noticed that it seems to be lacking the upper spaced-armour plate at the back - perhaps the bottom one behind the fuel tank as well.

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1416
Date:
Permalink   

The smaller Mark III Female sponsons are quite different to the Mark IV Female sponsons. The Mark III type don't fold inwards like those of the Mark IV. Consequently the Mark III sponson has lifting lugs that the Mark IV doesn't need. Also, the Mark IV sponson has a double run of rivets around it's upper edge whereas the Mark III has only a single line of rivets.

Early Mark IVs didn't have the spaced armour. Agree the missing stowage box is unusual but it's not unique.

Gwyn

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Fair enough. Thanks for explaining, Gwyn.

TCT

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard