Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Mk1 with Track Grousers


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Mk1 with Track Grousers
Permalink   


A mention was made in another thread about MK1 tanks and track grousers, rather than add to that thread I thought I would post this here.

Now strictly speaking Grousers were not used until the MKIIs and if anyone had told me they were fitted to the MK1 tanks, I would have disagreed with them. Only thing is, I hadn't accounted for the Palestine Tanks, were the rule book was thrown out the window and experimentation and adaptation was the norm. Extra armour, onboard sponson cranes, proper exhausts for the MK1s and it seems... Grousers.

Here is the only evidence I have, but like any discovery, once spotted more examples are found.

Helen x

 

 



Attachments
__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1486
Date:
Permalink   

2360804923_62d546a087_o.jpg

Tank C6 (752). Ditched. 2Lt Tarbet commanding. Arras.



__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1486
Date:
Permalink   

http://landships.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=63528&p=3&topicID=18165927

752 again.

"23 Apr 1917 –  "C" Battalion, 7 Company, C6, Lt HP Jones  –  Attached to VI Corps, Broke down. Did not Start. OR Restarted attacked and Knocked out by Shell. Photographed Broken Down, probably in Athies." from munkeezulu's site, here: https://sites.google.com/site/landships/home/lists/listofmkimaletanks



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1414
Date:
Permalink   

In my experience, proving something did exist is easier than proving it didn't. You only need evidence of one to prove the former, but you need evidence of all to prove the latter (unless it's impossible, of course).

Gwyn

__________________


General

Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Date:
Permalink   

Here is the photo referred too in post 3.



-- Edited by TeeELL on Monday 21st of April 2014 09:04:06 PM

Attachments
__________________

Regards TeeELL

Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional.



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   



__________________

Regards

Denis



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   



-- Edited by Alpha Six on Thursday 24th of April 2014 08:21:17 PM

__________________

Regards

Denis



Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 808
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you for the photo Alpha, I have not seen that one before.

That's what I like about this site, ask a question and you get answers, plus there is always something new that pops up.

Helen x

 



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   

Helen, thank you.
I find this photo at vol. 1 of Tankograd Verlag publication 'British tanks in German service' www.tankograd.com/cms/website.php
It dated by 1917

__________________

Regards

Denis

PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1486
Date:
Permalink   

Alpha Six wrote:

Helen, thank you.
I find this photo at vol. 1 of Tankograd Verlag publication 'British tanks in German service' www.tankograd.com/cms/website.php
It dated by 1917


Which is strange because the Mark I was never in German service.

Maybe something has been lost in translation; maybe it would be more accurate to say, "Some British Tanks that the Germans captured". 



__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   

The publication does not say that mk-1 was used by the German army.

"British tanks in German service" is only name of publication, illustrated by lot of photos, including this one in chapter devoted of history of tanks and their battle use.
So there is nothing strange.



__________________

Regards

Denis



General

Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Date:
Permalink   

Having read through the intro list of content at 'Tankograd' the only mention is of MkIV's. I think we need to stop this thread drift as it is all about the Mk1 fitted with track extensions (and, it seems, engine exhausts! - but that is another thread drift, sorry!!)

__________________

Regards TeeELL

Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional.



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   

Sorry, I only marked source of photo this MK-I with grousers ))

__________________

Regards

Denis



General

Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Date:
Permalink   

Alpha Six, my apologies I confess that I have failed to find the 'Mk1 with grousers' photo from your post.

__________________

Regards TeeELL

Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional.



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   

TeeEll, sorry, maybe I do not understand the peculiarities of the English language, but it is Mk-1 with grousers.





-- Edited by Alpha Six on Saturday 26th of April 2014 11:27:42 AM

__________________

Regards

Denis

PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1486
Date:
Permalink   

Alpha Six wrote:

The publication does not say that mk-1 was used by the German army.

"British tanks in German service" is only name of publication, illustrated by lot of photos, including this one in chapter devoted of history of tanks and their battle use.
So there is nothing strange.


Oh, that makes sense. Thanks, A6. 



__________________


General

Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Date:
Permalink   

Yes I too thank you Alpha Six for showing the photo. I was unable to find it through your reference.

__________________

Regards TeeELL

Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional.



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

Here is another view of the tank, taken by a British photographer. It became bogged in a marshy area on the north bank of Scarpe near Fampoux, while returning from an action at Roeux on Apr. 23, 1917. It remained behind British lines until the Germans retook this area in March 1918.



Attachments
__________________


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 174
Date:
Permalink   

Fate of A17 OH I SAY with grousers
s018.radikal.ru/i521/1601/e7/657bc34ba098.jpg


__________________

Regards

Denis



Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks for posting this link, Denis. I had seen this photo before, but never in enough resolution to identify the tank as A17. The photo would indicate that A17 survived the Somme battle of 1916, and was destroyed during the Arras offensive in April 1917. By that time, the tank would have been reassigned to C or D Bn. HBMGC. Eight MkI female tanks took part in the Arras/Bullecourt fighting, and records show that two, 524 and 531, were destroyed by shellfire. I suspect it is 531, destroyed by a shell on April 11, 1917 at Bullecourt.

This photo, and that of 716 above, suggest that the MkI veteran tanks from the Somme may not have been repainted before going into action at Arras, and were still in "Solomon" camouflage.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard