Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Modelling -> Mk IV with grenade deflector
Post Info TOPIC: Mk IV with grenade deflector
RCD


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Date:
Mk IV with grenade deflector
Permalink   

On a site entitled tank encyclopaedia there is an illustration of a female MkIV with a grenade netting. Is this poetic licence by the illustrator or did actually happen? I thought such netting removed after the MkI.   



__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

This site, this page: http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww1/gb/tank_MkIV.php

This picture:

tank_MkIV_female_grille.png

Complete garbage is what it looks like to me! That's not even a Mark IV; looks like the artist took a picture of a Mark V and removed some bits. And what's that nonsense about "Hotchkiss Mk.I" machine guns!



__________________
Gwyn Evans


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1416
Date:
Permalink   

I despair...no



__________________
Rob


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink   

Didn't realise Tanks used fascines at Ypres 1917, too....

__________________

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roblangham
RCD


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Date:
Permalink   

It does show what you can find on the internet! When I taught I often used the 'banning dihydrogen monoxide' site to illustrate the problems of using the internet as an information source.



__________________
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

This sodding Tank Encyclopaedia site is atrocious. I don't know who's behind it, but great sections of it are flawed and garbled.  Naturally, it is frequently cited on Wikipedia,  sometimes alongside Landships, which is deeply embarrassing. 



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
RCD


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 185
Date:
Permalink   

I hope none of you gentlemen accuse me of being a troll for mentioning this web site! Nice illustration shame about its accuracy!



-- Edited by RCD on Monday 24th of November 2014 10:25:31 AM

__________________
Ironsides


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

James H wrote:

This sodding Tank Encyclopaedia site is atrocious. I don't know who's behind it, but great sections of it are flawed and garbled.  Naturally, it is frequently cited on Wikipedia,  sometimes alongside Landships, which is deeply embarrassing. 

Well They do apparently have a forum that boasts over 5,000 members with 298 posts between themwink

However they have asked for help from a "Historical fact checker"......

Probably best to start here: http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww1/gb/tank_MkI_proto_HD.jpg described as "Mother" despite that its a female.... of sorts.......

A thought it was a joke sight at first....... not a single reference mentioned.... oh hang on I just saw a credit for Wikiconfuse



__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 
Rectalgia


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

Ironsides wrote:

Well They do apparently have a forum that boasts over 5,000 members with 298 posts between themwink

The majority of those members appear to be anxious to improve the market share of the third-world economies dedicated to making more affordable for the frugal consumer goods of all kinds with famous labels.



__________________
Facimus et Frangimus
Gwyn Evans


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1416
Date:
Permalink   

Then this site needs a health warning for all manner of reasons.

__________________
CharlieC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2319
Date:
Permalink   

 

"Fences" and warnings don't seem to work very well on the Internet. I suspect there's a version of Gresham's Law in Economics (bad money drives out good) working

with the quality of information on the Internet. They have asked for help - although they may have no idea of the consequences of asking for help on the Internet.

My view is that they deserve a good monstering for the crap they've put up so far - it's lots easier to do this from the inside - after all they can hardly toss out people

who are trying to help. If they do toss out "helpful people" then they are intellectually broken and deserve what they get.

Regards,

Charlie

 



__________________
Rectalgia


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

A good starting point for them might be to block "public" access to their member list (through forum access permissions and robots.txt). For some reason public access (access by non-members) to the membership lists drives robot membership registrations (SEO demons and comment spammers) into a frenzy - I suppose any links in the profiles get "indexed" by search engines although Google at least is supposedly working to eliminate the benefit of such abuse.

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus
MRG


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Date:
Permalink   

Hmm, I would like to see this fictional tank attempting to use the unditching beam...  biggrin



__________________
TinCanTadpole


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

MRG wrote:

Hmm, I would like to see this fictional tank attempting to use the unditching beam...  biggrin

 Same problem with some Mk V and Mk V* tanks - the semaphore is in the way!



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Modelling -> Mk IV with grenade deflector
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard