Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Is this what I think it is?


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Is this what I think it is?
Permalink   


First of all, a warning: think carefully before watching this video about the development of the tank. It is so wrong about so many things that you might spontaneously combust. It contains many old favourite mistakes, plus lots of exciting new ones that hardly seem possible. It even gets wrong the date of the battle of "Fleurs", and notes that Swinton had the idea of an AFV while in Manchuria during the Russo-Japanese War. Dragon tractors confused with tanks. The Schneider and FT confused. So it goes on.

But there are two things that I think are of interest. From 10'22" for a few seconds there's a shot of mixed Mk Vs and FTs. I can't work out when & where that could be. There's only one man visible in the shot, and I can't tell if he's British or American. Any ideas?

But the main event is from 6'55" to 7'13". When I first saw it, my chin hit the keyboard. The quality isn't great, but I think you can tell what it is, if I'm right.

Any offers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxCZcNRF7Q



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 150
Date:
Permalink   

The writing on the side made me first think of one of those WW1 US National Guard 'tanks' like this i.imgur.com/T8eys9C.jpg but that 'arm' of the front reminded me of early French vehicles.
So I'm none the wiser- would love to know what you are thinking it is.

As for the chap at 10:22 I can't pause it to see it clearly but it looks like he turns to face the camera very briefly and to be wearing some kind of dark coloured armband.

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 461
Date:
Permalink   

Bonjour,

James, at 10' 22", the film was taken after the war. 

The two "char léger" was not Renault FT but American Six tons Model 1917.

Exhaust of the tank is on the left side, and you can see tools on the right side.

At 9' 54", it was an American Renault FT (with ace on the turret) inside Exermont (Ardennes - September, 29 th 1918).

From 10' 34" to 11' 15" - 502° RAS / 5° BCL / AS 315 inside Nampcel (August, 20 th 1918)

Bonne après-midi - Michel



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Michel; merci. I thought there might be an American connection

Vollketten: You are very warm, but I think it's this:

 

Best75.jpg



Attachments
__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

I'm becoming convinced that the clip is from the 1917 cinema serial "Patria", which has been discussed briefly on the forum.

This synopsis http://willbradley.com/work/film/patria/ ends with a summary of the final episode:

Episode 15: For the Flag. After being forced back, Baron Huroki plans a night attack. Patria’s men can barely hold out until morning, when they attack the combined Japanese and Mexican forces with a tank.

I was hoping the tank scene might be in this restored version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFUCd-T8w_k  but it doesn't seem to have made it. The final 20 mins are worth watching, though. It is a truly strange film.

Anyway, I'm going to have a word with some contacts in the USA to see if they know more.

 



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.



Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Been thinking again.

It's been accepted for some time now that a mockup tank overturned and collapsed during the making of a film. The claim is made convincingly in the article Our Forts on Wheels.

It seems to be assumed that it's the Holt G9, which is shown in the presence of US troops and also largely in pieces after the accident. But hang on. If the film clip is from Patria, then it  looks as if the tank that was a film prop wasn't the G9 - it was the C.L. Best Tracklayer. Or one of them; there was another Best Tracklayer, the one that looks like an upturned canoe and was used in recruiting drives and was photographed in a mock battle alongside real American soldiers. The one apparently in Patria operates alongside extras wearing a made-up uniform.

Now, in photos of the collapsed Holt G9, the name Caterpillar can be seen quire clearly on one of the broken panels. Not Best. And, as I say, in the presence of what seem to be genuine US troops.

So how about this for a possibility: the Best Tracklayer that appeared in Patria survived the experience. The other one was used for recruiting purposes. The Holt G9 (and it's been suggesred that there was more than one of them) was trialled by the army and that's the one that overturned.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard