In my searches I've uncovered the one time existance of two more American 'tanks'. The first of these is something called the Hamilton Tank (or the Victoria Tank). The only photo I can find shows this at a 1918 victory parade draped in an enormous stars and stripes that covers most of the detail. It has tracks that look similar to the Ford 3 ton and its probably about the same size.
The second is the Wickersham Land Torpedo which Icks says was a demolition tracked vehicle a la the WW2 Goliath (or I guess the French WW1 Crocodile). Unfortunately the only reference on Google is to the JED site to which I don't intend to take a subscription.
There's a picture of the Wickersham Land Torpedo in Fred Crismon's book U.S. Military Tracked Vehicles, ISBN: 087938672X. It looks very much like the Goliath.
I'll have a look for a picture of the Hamilton Tank; there's probably something in the same book. I'll scan them and try to work out how to post them here, something which has proved beyond me up to now.
As I am away from home for awhile, here is all I can do. The Wickersham Land Torpedo, was designed by Mr. Elmer E. Wickersham along with the Hold MFG CO.
I have attached the patent drawing's for the Land Torpedo; I also have some photos, I will supply after I get home.
This is the only photo I've found of the Hamilton - taken from the rear (I assume). I shouldn't be rude about the American flag (or any one elses) but I do wish it wasn't in this photo. The tank seems to have some sort of square turret and small panniers or sponsons. But who made it and why?
Centurion, from Hunnicutt's 'Firepower' (I paraphrase):
The tank was built in December 1915 by the Oakland Motor Car Company, part of the General Motors Corporation, as part of experimental work for the British [sic] government. It was designed by Mr A C Hamilton, Oakland's chief engineer. The picture with the flag shows it at an Armistice Day parade in 1918. Hamilton also designed another vehicle in late 1916, also for GM.
In the period before U.S. entry in WW1. Several companies guessed at the future needs of the U.S. Army and the possiblity of a U.S. entry into the European conflict. This tank was built by the Oakland Motor Company (the modern Pontiac) to British specifications in 1916. It used the same narrow tracks as the Ford 3 ton. It was not accepted.
I've attached the three images of 'your' machine from Hunnicutt's book. I'll scan the two photos of the other machine and attach them later.
Note, '...Buick, Studebaker, and Overland all made virtual copies' - look carefully at the picture I posted labelled 'Hamilton GM Machine 1' - is that a Buick name plate? Mind you, Buick was part of GM at the time...
I've discovered some American tanks from WW1: Steam tank "America"; Three wheeled steam tank; Holt Gas-Electric; Skeleton tank; The Best 75; The Best Tracklayer 75; The Holt 75 and The Holt G9... if you want something more about these vehicles.. write on forum and I'll give you some photos
I've discovered some American tanks from WW1: Steam tank "America"; Three wheeled steam tank; Holt Gas-Electric; Skeleton tank; The Best 75; The Best Tracklayer 75; The Holt 75 and The Holt G9... if you want something more about these vehicles.. write on forum and I'll give you some photos
If you've got anything that can shed any new light on any of these there are lots of people on this forum who would be interested. However some of these have already been batted back and forth in a number of threads so it might be worth having a look back at earlier pages first. Please post whatever you think might be useful as I for one am trying to amass info, the odd duplication won't hurt and there is always some more gold dust to pan out.
If you compare the track layout of the "Studebaker Supply Tank" and the Newton Tractor, you'll find theyre basically identical. Most prominent are the two bogies on a Y shaped bogie assembly on the sides.
I think it's fair to assume the "Studebaker Tank", was just a modified Newton.
I haven't found informaitons about "Holt G-9" (or Caterpillar tank) at this site.. I know just that it was based on Holt's 10 ton model 75 tracked prime mover and its top speed was 3 mph. I also know there were several modifications of this monster (Holt G-9 001 - it wasr Holt G-9 with 2 turrets). Here are some photos:
Here's some information . . . re: RE: "America" U.S. Army Steam Battle Tank of 1918
The AMERICAN STEAM BATTLE TANK
The Steam Tank (Tracked) was an early U.S. tank design of 1918 imitating the pattern of the British Mark IV tank but powered by steam.
The type was designed by an officer from the U.S. Army's Corps Of Engineers. The project was started by General John A. Johnson with the help of the Endicott and Johnson Shoe Company and financed by the Boston bankers Phelan and Ratchesky (it cost $60,000). Expertise was called in from Stanley Motor Carriage Company in Watertown, Massachusetts, that produced steam cars. The engines and boilers of two Unit Railway Cars were built in. Earlier fighting vehicles projects had employed steam power because petrol engines were not yet powerful enough; the Steam Battle Tank however used it for the main reason that it was meant to be a specialized flame thrower to attack pillboxes and the original design had this weapon driven by steam. When the main device to build up sufficient pressure became a 35 hp auxiliary gasoline engine, the two main 2-cylinder steam engines with a combined horsepower of 500 remained, each engine driving one track to give a maximum speed of 4 mph. The transmission allowed two speeds forward and two in reverse. The steam engines used kerosene for fuel.
The flame thrower, located in the front cabin, had a range of 90 feet; additionally there were four 0.30 inch machine guns; two in a sponson at each side. The length of the vehicle was 34 feet 9 inches, the width 12 feet 6 inches and the height 10 feet 4.5 inches. The tracks were 24 inches wide. Each track frame carried mud clearing spikes, sometimes mistaken for battering rams. The tank had a weight of about fifty short tons. There was to have been a crew of eight, on the assumption there were a commander, a driver, an operator of the flame thrower, a mechanic and four machine gunners.
Only one Steam Battle Tank was completed in Boston and demonstrated during April 1918, in several parades also, on one occasion breaking down in front of the public library. The prototype was in June shipped to France to be tested with much publicity to bolster allied morale and was named America. The flame thrower nozzle was moved to a rotating turret on the roof of the cabin.
There was also another steam-powered AFV project (the Steam Wheel Tank) that didn't use tracks but was three-wheeled, hence the designation "(Tracked)" or "(Track-laying)". The design combined serious cooling problems with a dangerous vulnerability due to its two steam boilers and large fuel reservoirs needed to heat the two main engines, and feed both the auxiliary engine and the flame thrower.
US Army Corps of Engineers Steam Tank General characteristics Crew 8 Length 10.6 m Width 3.8 m Height 3.2 m Weight 50.8 tons Armour and armament Armour 13 mm Main armament flame thrower Secondary armament four machine guns Mobility Power plant 2 steam 500 hp (373 kW) Suspension unsprung Road speed 4 mph Power/weight 9.8 hp/tonne Range ?
- - - - - - - - -
To general knowledge and according to the curator of the Patton Museum, there is only one photograph with it's negative showing the American steam battle tank in operation known to exist. At the current time, I happen to own that image. The picture was taken on Beacon Street Boston sometime in early 1918. It shows the big tank rumbling along amid billows of blinding steam. The photo may have been taken the day that the steam tank broke down near the Boston Public Library. Will attempt to post a form of that image below.
Hi Tim R, My son is doing his history project on tanks and he needs primary sources.He has to give a reference for his bibliography.can you help?Gina W
Tanks in the great war, 1914-1918 - Fuller, J. F. C. (John Frederick Charles), 1878-1966 (as Fuller was a key figure in British WWI Tank work its very much primary)