Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Those WW2 Mk Vs


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Those WW2 Mk Vs
Permalink Closed


I think I've managed to piece together some definite reasons why those stories of Soviet Mk Vs used in WW2 are in the main legends and myths.


In 1930 a series of international disarament conferences were held in Geneva. They concluded that heavy tanks were "instruments of agression" and all peace loving nations should abandon them. America, Britain and Italy had no heavy tanks and they didn't fit into their current thinking so no problem there. Germany wasn't allowed tanks and Japan had no tanks worth speaking of. France publically announced that it was scrapping its heavy tanks and decommisioned all the old obsolescent Mk V and V*s it still had (and quietly commenced development of the Char B2). Stalin wanted to make a public gesture (whilst still developing heavy tanks) and so ,as in France, all those Mk Vs left over from the civil war were shipped off to towns deemed to have played a key role in the Revolution, rendered inoperable and coverted into public memorials (and generally allowed to rust). Thus in theory there were no working Mk Vs in the Soviet Union after 1930. However in 1940 the Soviet Union had annexed the Baltic States and aquired some further Mk Vs. It seems that four working tanks were  stored at Tallin. These were deployed in 1914 in defence of Tallin in the role of mobile blockhouses. These were almost certainly the last Mk Vs to see action.



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Centurion,

This is a very good explanation for the 1941 MkV period, but is there an explanation of the Mk.V being used in stalingard? There is a photo of German soldiers standing around a Mk.V at stalingard, it was posted on this forum a while ago.

Also I am curious about the claim that some garford putilovs were used in 1941, does anyone have anything more on that?


-- Edited by eugene at 04:31, 2006-05-31

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

eugene wrote:


Hi Centurion, This is a very good explanation for the 1941 MkV period, but is there an explanation of the Mk.V being used in stalingard? There is a photo of German soldiers standing around a Mk.V at stalingard, it was posted on this forum a while ago. Also I am curious about the claim that some garford putilovs were used in 1941, does anyone have anything more on that? -- Edited by eugene at 04:31, 2006-05-31

There are plenty of photos of German soldiers standing around Mk Vs in various cities (Smolensk for example). These are those tanks put there as static monuments in 1930 and just happened to be there when the Germans invaded. I would guess that the Stalingrad one was another of these.

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

Here are some of those Mk Vs

Attachments
oldtank2zx.jpeg (194.6 kb)
kharkov_506.jpeg (120.0 kb)
mark029kw.jpeg (61.8 kb)
__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard