Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Somme numbers


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Somme numbers
Permalink   


I can find many references to the British casualty figures on day one of the Somme but nothing on the total number of British soldiers that went over the top that day (my grandfather amongst them). Does anyone have these figures? I'm involved in a work that amongst other things will be looking at the change in tactics etc between the Somme and Amiens. Fuller provides lots of useful stats for Amiens but there isn't anything like the same for the Somme (I think the awful casualty figures have captured everybody's attention).

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Nothing in detail, I'm afraid, but Gordon Corrigan (in Mud, Blood and Poppycock) states:

The main British attacking force would be the Fourth Army, of sixteen divisions and nearly half a million men. The Third Army (Allenby), to the north, would assist with diversionary attacks, and the Reserve Army (Gough) would stand by to reinforce and to roll up the German flanks if breakthrough was achieved.

It's odd that virtually every time one reads about the first day of the Somme battles the casualty figures are always mentioned, but I've never seen anywhere a figure for total numbers of combatants.

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

Lyn Macdonald in "Somme" gives a figure of 150,000 British troops going over the top on July 1st. John Keegan, in "The First World War", states that 100,000 entered no man's land. Martin Middlebrook, in "The First Day on the Somme", says that 143 battalions attacked, and that the 57,000 casualties represented almost exactly half of their strength. 

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

This quote tends to bear out what you say:

At 0730 hours on the 1st July 1916, the first wave of 66,000 British Tommies responded to their officer's whistles and, rifles held ‘at the port’ across their chests, left their trenches en masse, or rose to their feet where they had lain hidden in No Man’s Land. They ‘Went over the Top’ at a slow walk towards the German barbed wire entanglements and trenches. Another 40,000 Tommies followed in subsequent waves of infantrymen.

It's from here: Somme Article

Presumably Corrigan's figure of 'nearly half a million men' was the total strength of the Fourth Army, of whom only a relatively small proportion would have actually gone over the top.

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 456
Date:
Permalink   

That's a common enough error: as the logistical tail of modern armies tend to grow and grow, to get the proper perspective on losses, you'll have to set the losses in proportion of the number of men in actual combat, really in harms way, not just milling about in the area.


But "in harms way" is another problem, of course. I believe that in order to be said to have been a combat veteran in WW2 (in the US Army), you simply have had to spend at least some part of your service within the range of enemy artillery.


So I concur: to understand the scale of the British losses during the first day on the Somme, you have to set them in proportion to how many men who actually climbed out of the trenches that morning.



-- Edited by Peter Kempf at 10:41, 2006-08-13

__________________
/Peter Kempf


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

Peter Kempf wrote:



But "in harms way" is another problem, of course. I believe that in order to be said to have been a combat veteran in WW2 (in the US Army), you simply have had to spend at least some part of your service within the range of enemy artillery.


-- Edited by Peter Kempf at 10:41, 2006-08-13




A number of US Generals (Paton included) strongly disagreed with this definition basically saying that being in a combat zone and being in combat were two different matters.


Enemy artillery range is also a variable concept. During  Desert Shield/Storm (and for some months after) the US defined sizeable parts of the Northern Gulf as being within range of Iraqi artillery, as the Scud  and Al Hussaini missiles could reach that far, and paid combat rates to soldiers in that area.  In the months after the end of that conflict I met a reservist US army captain in Al Khobar, Saudi, who was responsible for disposing of all the equipment (including things like PCs) that the army didn't want to have to ship back to the US and was surplus. He was a combination of Milo Milebender (Catch 22) and Sgt Bilko with lots of 'private' deals on the side. He found it hillarious that he was getting combat pay - a Southern Democrat he was still a big fan of G Bush (snr) for that very reason.



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard