Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Back to the Tankodrome


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Back to the Tankodrome
Permalink Closed


I enclose another scanned image. This shows flimsies being unloaded at the tankodrome amidst a number of sponsonless Mk Is. The date is later than April 1917 as in the far background sits a Mk IV female (I enclose a blowup). The Mk Is are not passive hulks as exhaust fumes show motors running. They do not appear to be in the midst of conversion to supply (and in any case the number on the tank nearest the camera indicates it was female). What were these tanks being used for?

Attachments
Aatanka0008.jpg (396.2 kb)
Aatankb1.jpg (240.7 kb)
Aatankb2.jpg (361.4 kb)
Aatankb3.jpg (87.7 kb)
__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1076
Date:
Permalink Closed

The two numbered tanks in that photo are 564 and 528, both female, but I would say that they are not running. The exhaust fumes originate from a point beyond the Mk IV female in the background. I've marked this out. Notice the way the fumes dissipate and expand the further you get from the source. This would not happen anywhere near as much with a tank running close to the camera. Another point is that if the exhaust was from 564, it would obscure the trestles on the tanks behind 564.


There is also what looks to be a male tank hiding just behind the back of the truck.



Attachments
__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink Closed

528 is a veteran of Flers-Courcelette (D23) which lost a track while moving up in support of the 15th Div. near Martinpuich. It was reported as repaired by Sept. 17,1916. The Mk.I's were said to have been in generally poor mechanical condition by the spring of 1917, and D Bn. re-equipped with Mk.IV's in July 1917. Driver training was often done with sponsons removed, so if these tanks were still runners, perhaps that was their use. No info on 564 yet, other than it was not on the roster of C and D Co. vehicles on Sept. 15, 1916. 

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard