Many of you will remember this vehicle, it was brought up in another thread ages ago in reference to this same card drawing. Someone made reference to a black and white picture in a book I do not have, and stated some information about it.
I would love to see that picture, and to know anything at all about this bizarre little vehicle. I have never seen images of it in any book, and it seems quite an interesting vehicle.
This image is taken out of a collection of WWI cards depicting WWI vehicles, all of which were identified with pictures provided to boot, but very little was mentioned about this vehicle. I hate to start a whole new thread dedicated to this little vehicle, but I really am curious!
Hello Roger, thank you for the image! I have never seen this before.
The text seems to be in three languages - Dutch, German, and English? And written in a very odd way, I can't seem to get it to translate correctly. But, translating the French, which is easiest for me as I know a tiny smidgen of proper French spelling, the text seems to say:
"An armoured French motorcycle employed succesfully for reconaissance mainly on narrow roads."
Or something to that effect. Very interesting - at least now we know who built the thing! I wonder what the crew on this contraption would be? There are viewports on both sides of the gun, so one could assume at least two - although it seems like the vehicle would have been very cramped at that point. It seems it would have been cramped no matter what!
This vehicle was a fairly early AFV! Apparently the "Wills, Military Motors" cigarette cards, one if which is the subject of the first post of this thead, were printed in 1916. Which means this odd little vehicle was made either in 1916 or before. Interesting! Another piece in the puzzle.
Somewhere in this forum is the photo of this vehicle that I posted months ago in response to a similar question about the same cig card. The thing is a British motorcycle combo covered in armour plate. The driver would have his head and shoulders sticking out but the side car passenger, sitting lower , would be better protected. I have to go out but this evening I'll try and find the picture I posted and repost.
Centurion, I am very interested in this vehicle, and I do not remember ever seeing the information you mention.
If it is a british vehicle, then how come the caption of that one photograph says it is French? Perhaps it was sold to the French?
And that one person had his head poking out makes sense - there does seem to be some sort of bulge on the top of one side of the vehicle. Interesting. I'd love to see the full extent of your information, because apparently it was never posted on this forum! How odd...
Vilkata wrote: I'd love to see the full extent of your information, because apparently it was never posted on this forum! How odd... ---Vil.
Things seem to get lost in this forum - for example I've made some 1200 posts but doing a search on my login name only retrieves just over 200! But, and here's the crazy thing, its not always the same 200.
While I'm looking you might find this summarised history of the motorcyle carried machine gun of interest - its part of a larger work in progress of mine.
Ten years later the French firm of DeDion produced a motorised quadricycle (the late Victorian equivalent of the modern quad bike). This could carry a driver and a passenger. The first sat on a saddle and steered with handlebars whilst the passenger occupied a seat in between (and slightly ahead) of the two front wheels; this of course ensured that they would be first to the scene of any accident. This vehicle inspired the first of a long line of Renault cars. It was also either built under licence or copied in other countries. One producer was the British firm of Beeston Motor Cycles in Coventry. In 1899 the inventor Frederick Simms converted one of these vehicles into a motorised scout. The passenger seat was replaced with boxes for an ammunition belt and an air cooled Maxim machine gun was fitted on a tube steel frame in front of the handlebars. This had a relatively small armoured shield. The whole thing was a sort of early quad bike armed with a machine gun.
As an armed motor scout this vehicle would have been of problematic effectiveness. Its rider would have been extremely vulnerable to return fire and it would have been next to impossible to operate the gun and drive and steer at the same time. A scout vehicle’s prime task is to reconnoitre the enemy and report back, it is not to sit and fight, any gun carried is for defence. Given the forward pointing gun with limited traverse the Simms motor scout could only operate in an offensive mode. It was not adopted by any military organisation. However the idea of using motorcycles to carry machine guns was adopted. Initially the first true motorcycle to carry a machine gun was in service with the Canadian 80th Militia regiment in 1908, they used a Harley Davidson motorcycle and sidecar combination with a forward facing Maxim gun. Its inventor, a Sergeant Northover, was to become better known as the inventor of the Northover projector issued widely to the British Home Guard in the 1940s. By the outbreak of war in 1914 the idea of using a motorcycle and sidecar combination to carry a heavy machine gun had been translated into material form by a number of British manufacturers the chief of which were Clyno, Enfield and Scott. As with the armoured car it was the Royal Navy that led the field but eventually such vehicles had been taken into service in the British Army equipping units of the Machine Gun Corps. These were machine gun carriers, much as was the Bren gun carrier of the Second World War. They were a means of getting a Vickers machine gun, its ammunition and crew as quickly as possible to the point where they were needed. The gun could be dismounted and deployed on a conventional tripod mounting (also carried on the machine) or from the sidecar itself whilst the vehicle was stopped. It was rarely, if ever, fired from a moving vehicle in action. The severe shaking and jolting would make aiming extremely problematical and any bullets arriving anywhere near the enemy would be the result of sheer chance. The gun was sometimes fired rearwards from the sidecar of the combination when stationary, this was a useful tactic when providing a rearguard for the vehicle could quickly roar off to a new position when the advancing enemy became too close.
At least one British motorcycle combination of 1914 was armoured, its make is not known. A photograph exists of bewhiskered and rather well fed French officers examining the vehicle and doubtless expressing some satisfaction that they would not be asked to ride in or on the dammed contraption. They make it difficult to see the details of the machine but it is obvious that the armour plate would only have protected the lower regions of its crew.
By mid 1915 it had become obvious that the war in France was for the foreseeable future going to be relatively static and trench based. There was little or nothing for the motorcycle combinations to do and eventually most of their crews were retrained and became tank crews.
I've seen "Lola" somewhere on this forum but can't find her ennymore. Comment was that the photo (vehicle) wasn't a WW1 vehicle and possible a sort of dummy (joke?)
Yes, definitely a joke (unless PDA's dwarves were recruited/conscripted) but appears to be WW1 vintage (seems to be 1917). The German military minds, being keen students of humour , would know that an effective way to remove the uncertainty and fear surrounding the introduction of the new terror weapon would be to mock it.
And, who knows? maybe it was (also) used as a "firing solutions" dummy for AT gunner training. Reduced-size models at correspondingly shorter ranges satisfy the same geometric solutions as do full-sized ones at the full range. I certainly wouldn't want to negotiate an obstacle course on that thing (presumably it can turn but I don't see how).
-- Edited by Rectalgia on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 08:11:56 AM
Good heavens - searching on "Lola", now why didn't I think of that?
Talking of Lola, notice she is depicted sitting side-saddle on a gun tube. Now, although some ladies opted to remain side-saddle long after the event, the invention by Queen Victoria of ladies underpants in the later part of her reign allowed women of all kinds to sit astride - as they had not done since the times of Good Queen Anne (Anne of Bohemia), sometime prior to her untimely death in 1394, at Sheen Manor.
Anyone who is male and who was sentient in 1989 will recall Cher sitting astride a gun barrel of the main armament of the USS Missouri warbling "If I could turn back time." I can just imagine the confrontation with her agent. "Oooh, you meant sixteen inches WIDE? Well, I suppose I could try." But I digress, that spectacle is offered merely as a comparison datum.
Not to put too fine a point upon it, I suggest that Lola was not naturally of the lady-like kind, perhaps a kindred spirit to Cher, and accordingly she should be placed in the reign of QVR, before underpants gave her an option in the gun-barrel-sitting-upon business.
So, yet another theory on the nature/vintage/credibility of that picture, based on relentless logic and informed by suitably obscure and arcane knowledge (id est, ladies knickers) - prior to 1901.