I'm curently trying to put together an article on flamethrowers. The French certainly at least trialed them as I have found photos. However from what I can find so far they didn't have the range the French wanted. Patience mon brave. I hope to complete soon.
Centurion wrote:I'm curently trying to put together an article on flamethrowers. The French certainly at least trialed them as I have found photos. However from what I can find so far they didn't have the range the French wanted. Patience mon brave. I hope to complete soon.
Hi Centurion thanks for the reply, does this mean they did'nt use them in combat? so far I've been unable to locate any info either way....I'm only really interested in weapons actually used in combat....Cheers
I'll Rephrase that "weapons that actually saw service" since it doesnt follow that a weapon in service was actually used in combat although it would be interesting to hear of it...cheers
I'm still trying to bottom this out - there are contradictory accounts one of which says they tried them in action in 1914 but found them too short range and the other that they only trialed them. They certainly had them and the first British flamethrower was based on the french one.
I've got a little bit on this. A French company called Hersent filed two patents in March and November 1915 for a flamethrower. Some features of it were borrowed by a British Captain Vincent, who was already working on the idea, and trialed in December. Britain began investigating the idea in July 1915, when the Germans used them at Ypres, but they were used against the French and on the Eastern front before that. The French captured and trialed some - I've seen a pic of that - but were not impressed. It doeesn't seem as if the French would have had them in 1914, although I've seen a design from 1910. Hersent's design of March was for twin drums mounted on a two-wheeled carriage.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Maybe The photos I have of French with Flamethrowers are not showing captured German equipment nor Hersent being single cylinder back packs. I've also a photo of a British naval flame thrower also back pack - said but not verified to be taken in 1914.
There is a hard copy source I can possibly access for more info but not until later this week
I am still working on that article but thought it worth reporting that the French most definitely did use flamethrowers in combat. Developing a one man portable unit superior to the German flamenwerfer, these were used in support of both British and American troops in 1918
Sorry for the delay in getting you the information I promised, I have been a little busy, I will send some tonight. Are you just interested in just French equipment, or are you working on all countries that used flame throwers?
All the Best Tim R
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal" -Cicero 106-43BC
Centurion wrote: I am still working on that article but thought it worth reporting that the French most definitely did use flamethrowers in combat. Developing a one man portable unit superior to the German flamenwerfer, these were used in support of both British and American troops in 1918
Brilliant. I'm looking forward to that.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Hi all, found these Pics of French flamethrowers, They dont look to bad to me but also I dont think they are combat pics probarbly the trials earlier mentioned.....
I think that the first photo represents a demo made by the French to the Americans when the option of attaching French flame throwing units to US forces was being discussed.
Happened to spot this in Martin Gilbert's First World War.
On September 15th, 1918 a combined Serb/French/Italian attack took place against Bulgarian and German units. "So tenacious were the Bulgarian machine-gunners, however, that the French used flamethrowers, for the first time on the Salonica Front, to dislodge them . . . "
So for the first time on that Front, but not for the first time.
Here's a pic of a French job. The date (in the top r-h) seems to be March 1916.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
"Portable flamethrowers were employed in about equal quantities by Germany and France; the British patterns (Norris-Menchen and Lawrence) were not used in combat save for a smaller version at Zeebrugge (I suspect that would be the RN one). The French portable projector, carried on the back of the single crewman, was styled the Schilt (after its inventor, Captain Schilt of the Paris Fire Brigade, who also organised the flamethrower companies. It carried 3 gallons of fuel and could project 8 or 10 bursts up to 30 yards' range, or a single burst up to 100 yards."
That sounds like the one in the picture above. Why a fireman should invent a flamethrower is something I would have thought might need looking into.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
"Portable flamethrowers were employed in about equal quantities by Germany and France; the British patterns (Norris-Menchen and Lawrence) were not used in combat save for a smaller version at Zeebrugge (I suspect that would be the RN one). The French portable projector, carried on the back of the single crewman, was styled the Schilt (after its inventor, Captain Schilt of the Paris Fire Brigade, who also organised the flamethrower companies. It carried 3 gallons of fuel and could project 8 or 10 bursts up to 30 yards' range, or a single burst up to 100 yards."
That sounds like the one in the picture above. Why a fireman should invent a flamethrower is something I would have thought might need looking into.
The Paris fire brigade first produced a flame thrower during the Siege in 1870. It was actually used by the Communards during the following uprising. Schilt produced a number of large flame throwers before he came up with his one man portable. Why a fireman would produce a flamethrower is disapointingly obvious - the first flame throwers were essentially man powered pumps that could project a jet or spray of liquid, early fire engines were based on a man powered pump that could project a jet or spray of liquid. In one case inflammable in the other water but the mechanisms were very similar.