William Pitt Shattuck II was a citizen of Minneapolis and a general purpose inventor (a sort of American Wallace without a Grommit). In 1918 he claimed to have invented the 'tank' as early as 1888. He appears to have designed an armed, armoured and tracked vehicle and on the 31st of March to have offered the design to King Leopold of Belgium for the rescue Stanley in the Congo. The thing was steam powered and burnt wood! Sounds like a real steam punk's dream. It would seem that there was some correspondance beteen Leopold's officials ( who returned the designs with the commont that whilst it seemed a practical concept by the time it could be built and shipped to Africa Stanley would have long since snuffed it) and later with the rescued Stanley (one presumes). Stanley is said to have been quite complementary about the idea. The Minneapolis Tribune apparently printed a drawing of the mobile fort ion March 23rd 1890 - this would be interesting to see. Shattock ,it seems, was something of an expert on transmission systems (a sort of early Wilson), this lends some credibility to the claim. The American Ambulance Service used a trailer designed by Shattuck in France in WW1 so he wasn't just some nutty professor.
A wood burning steam tank beggers the imagination "put another log on Carruthers, I can see the smoke from the steam panzerwagen we're pursuing"
A reprint of an article in the Minneapolis Tribune that originally appeared in March 1918. At that time Shattuck lived at 2125 Girard Avenue South, Minneapolis. There is a cross reference to the same article in a more recent biography of Mackenzie King the one time Canadian Prime Minister to whom Shattuck was related in some manner.
Hi, I think this claim probarbly belongs to Leonardo! by the way the guns in his tank were probarbly breechloaders.......
"William Pitt Shattuck II was a citizen of Minneapolis and a general purpose inventor (a sort of American Wallace without a Grommit). In 1918 he claimed to have invented the 'tank' as early as 1888."
Still would be interesting to see a pic......steam powered machines were all the rage in the late 1800's some even tryed flying machines powered by steam engines!.......that's aeroplanes rather then airships possibly with some limited success......
I think the thing that Leonardo didn't have was tracks which Shattuck claimed to have invented for his vehicle. Leanardo might make a claim for an armoured car.
The most effective steam aero engine was developed mid 19th century by Stringfellow. It had a flash steam system using kerosene as the fuel. This did away with the need for a big boiler and was very light and Stingfellow did get an unmanned aircrafyt to fly with this. Maxim tried a similar motor in his aircraft and almost got airborne (the design of the aircraft was his real problem). Most steam cars in the 1900 - 1920s used this type of engine and the world land speed record was once held by a car powered by this type of engine. It could have been used for tanks. However I supect that Shattucks wood burning engine would have been a mite heavier.
Thanks for the post about Shattuck, Centurion, this is a fascinating tale.
I would argue that Maxim's was the most effective aero-engine of the 19th century, as his man-carrying flying test rig did achieve take-off (though not controlled flight) under its own power, thus surpassing the achievement (great as it was) of Stringfellow's brilliantly conceived model. And, of course, a steam-powered tank was built, by the Americans.
As to whether the Victorians could have developed a steam tank, why not? Steam traction engines were surely powerful enough, and the caterpillar track concept was invented many times. There's even a connection with the earliest aviation pioneers - Sir George Cayley designed a tracked railway-style freight truck in the mid-nineteenth century.
An example of the multitude of such concepts is this, from Scientific American (scanned from a Dover book of old transport):
It looks suspiciously like this 1884 patent:
With no roadwheels, I suspect that the tracks would have been very vulnerable to breakage, but the basic idea is there.
And who could ignore the magnificent Batter design of 1888:
Be that as it may, if anyone digs up any more information about Shattuck's machine, I for one would love to see it.
Your sources are correct, found the article easily, after discovering that the grand new main library is only open two nights a week due to budget issues, in the Sunday, March 23, 1890 edition of the Minneapolis Tribune. It has two patent type figures, a side and a cutaway view. Though it is not one of the inventor's 8 issued patents. Once I reunite my computer and scanner this week end I will post it.
It is not a precursor to the tank, but you can make a case that it is to the Amtrac. Like the LTV-1 it is designed to cross swamps, waterways and solid ground. It is has a single full width all-around track. Grousers are to be attached for water travel. The track is curve both fore and aft as well as athwartships (sideways) to allow for easier steering. This would be critical since the only steering is by two turnable steel discs, fore and aft acting, as land and water rudders.
The armor and armament are to be added as needed, also like the LVT-1. Its stated assumptions about the need for these in Africa, to find Stanley, are not very politically correct.
You're a star sir! I look forward to seeing the scan.
Leopold and Stanley's activities re the Congo were pretty reprehensible to put it mildly and today might well have been refered to as genocide. Given Shattuck's non PC attitude I guess he was probably consistant with his times given that slavery had only been abolished in the US about 20 years previously and was only just being ended in some parts of the remaining Spanish empire! Shattuck himself was born when it was still in existance in the US, his father had been killed by people in those days still reffered to as Red Indians. The Sioux Apache etc were still being repressed. We may live in rough and nasty times today - they were even rougher and nastier in the 1880s.
That is an amazing find, Neal! Thanks for looking for it, I think a lot of people here would love to see it!
Craig, the sliked bread box is a model of one of Kaiser Bill's flights of fancy! He was very keen on doodling and sketching 'ideal' cruisers, battleships and, in this case, armoured landships.
"Craig, the sliked bread box is a model of one of Kaiser Bill's flights of fancy! He was very keen on doodling and sketching 'ideal' cruisers, battleships and, in this case, armoured landships."
Hi, for a moment I actually got quite excited thinking it may be the armoured body for the Batter tractor.....
Here are the two figures of William P Shattuck's 1890 Amtrac proposal for rescuing Stanley. The micro-film readers were universally problematic at the library, so it will take till next week to type up or fix the text for the article.
In the cross section, A indentifies the top and bottom run of the track. Its sideways curved crossection is obvious. B identifies the rollers and you can see the drive gear in the middle of the bottom run of the track from the steam engine.
Fascinating stuff, neal, thanks for going to the trouble to track it down and post it here, I look forward to anything else you have on this! I'm very anxious to see what Mr Shattuck wrote in relation to his proposal to rescue Stanley... Certainly, if this is Mr Shattuck's porposal for the Congo, then it doesn't qualify as a tank. But it's definitely a fascinating machine.
Roger Todd wrote: Certainly, if this is Mr Shattuck's porposal for the Congo, then it doesn't qualify as a tank.
But definitely a landship! If Shattuck proposed mounting guns and any form of armour it would also be an AFV. The profile is certainly more in line with what Wilson and Tritton came up with than say the Schnieder or the A7V.
Neal Gunderson him diamond! Many thanks indeed for this.
Full circle - that was the article I was trying to summarise in my first posting. Just as background William Pitt Shattuck the first was a fur trapper operating on the US/Canadian border. With a name like William Pitt I would imagine that the family were originally loyalists who'd moved north during one of the 'misunderstandings' between Britain and North America. There was a connection with the Mackenzie family who went on to be major players in the Canadian political scene and it was one of the Mackenzies who tracked down and brought to trial two local chiefs for William Pitt I's murder (they had apparently been confronted robbing his trap lines). All good staple fare for a movie starring John Wayne, Gary Cooper or the like. It would seem that William Pitt II was brought up and educated by his Mackenzie kinfolk but forsook woodcraft for inventing.