Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Can anyone help me resolve a romantic notion re Mk1 m D20?


Private

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Can anyone help me resolve a romantic notion re Mk1 m D20?
Permalink   



I am new to this forum and am researching my Grandfather's action at Beaumont Hamel/Beuacourt in mid Nov 1916 where he got a "good" blighty.

My mother is called Daphne; I understand that 2 or 3 D Company tanks were in the vanguard of the action at the time he was wounded (http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Base/1545/WWI/Main/History/1916-1.htm).  I also understand from the Malins film of the Battle of the Ancre that D20 was called HMLS "Daphne" - also references on this forum (http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=63528&p=3&topicID=5599809).

Is it a romantic notion of mine that my Grandfather called his daughter after one of the two tanks that he was engaged with?

I have looked all over the web, and connot get a definitive answer; perhaps one of the members of this forum has a better source and can help resolve this for me once and for all.

I would welcome your help and assistance.

Thanks in advance

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 433
Date:
Permalink   

The war diary of D Co. HBMGC describes the action on 13-14/11/16 as follows: "Orders were received to attack isolated strong point situated Q17 b7.4. Lts. Drader, Robinson F A were detailed with Lt. Bell in reserve. On journey to starting point Lt. Robinson's tank was hit by shell fire and placed out of action. Infantry guide was picked up and travelled in leading tank (Lt. Drader).
"At Zero (6 am) tanks advanced to the attack and at 50 yds range Lt. Drader opened fire with 6 pdr guns. The tanks still advanced and crossed the first line of the strong point doing good enfilading work. Simultaneously the enemy hoisted the white flag. The tanks at this moment became ditched and an awkward situation arose, which was handled spendidly by both officers. A machine gunner was detailed to watch for any sign of treachery on the part of the enemy, and the officers and crews then left the tanks, and entered the German trenches with loaded revolvers,
"They coaxed the enemy out of their dugouts and after about an hour the prisoners who numbered over 400 were despatched to rear with an infantry escort. When the adverse conditions as regards ground are reckoned with, this must be considered a very fine performance and all ranks engaged in the operation are to be congratulated."
Lt. Drader in known to have commanded D20 "Daphne" on 15/9/16, and evidence form Malin's film suggests that he was still in command of this tank at the Battle of the Ancre.
The photograph shows a present day view of the area where the action occurred, looking NNE across the Ancre from the vicinity of the Schwaben Redoubt. The action would have taken place in the fields above the Ancre Cemetary. Incidentally, it gives a good indication of the view the Germans were fighting so hard to retain. Unfortunately, I do not have a trench map showing coordinates for this area, but I think the redoubt in question is indicated on the map of the 63 Div. attack (photograph and map from "Beamont Hamel" by Nigel Cave.) 



Attachments
__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

An extra detail is that due to one of those typical cockups that occur from time to time the two tanks were well in advance of their supporting infantry  so that had the German's decided otherwise the tanks would have been 'cold meat'. It seems that the fact that the two tanks were effectively imobilised was concealed from the Germans. Some superb bluffing.

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard