Have just read an account of Gallipoli that mentions a trench mortar party. We are agreed that the Stokes wasn't available. What mortars were used there?
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Quite a lot of "home made" ones. Both the Australians and British had workshops turning these out. The British ones seem in the main to have been made by the Cyclist Company of the RMLI improvising from lengths of cast iron water (or drainage) pipe. I don't have ready access to details of the Australian ones at the moment but there are some photos of these that I'm sure some Australian members of the forum will post. The British also had some "professionaly" made Japanese mortars
Thanks, Cent. I've just found a reference to "half a dozen Japanese mortars with limited ammunition" used there.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
I believe these are men of the Cyclist Company of the RMLI with some of their products. There is a periscope rifle mounting standing just in front of the copy of a Leach catapult. The mortar to the right is one of the 'drain pipe' conversions (which looks very similar to the 4 inch SMLproduced at Woolwich) and the one to the left appears to be based on the Australian Garland. If you look closely it has a slightly different bracing arrangement to the one in the Australian War Memorial featured in the photo below the first one (and which has part of the barrel missing). There appears to have been some sharing (nicking?) of designs between the Australians and British as the Australians also produced a periscope rifle and claimed to be the inventors of the idea (but there are photos of British and French periscope rifles on the Western front before the Gallipoli campaign opened) The Garland as used at Quinns Post is shown in the attached photo
Thank you, gents. I have also come across this pic of an Australian mortar in action.
I am interested to learn that the author Compton Mackenzie was at Gallipoli and published his memoirs of the campaign. He makes considerable mention of the Japanese mortars and the ammunition for them, describing the difficulty that the Allied forces experienced in arranging for the two to be in the same place at the same time:
According to the diary of an ANZAC soldier, the Japanese mortar projectiles were 26lb. The Osprey book on Gallipoli again mentions the 6 mortars (with inadequate ammunition) and also refers to an action in the Helles sector on June 21st in which 29th and 52nd Dvns took a section of Gully Ravine, greatly assisted by the loan of two (unspecified) French mortars.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
I can't find a satisfactory pic of the Krupp. The Great War Forum says "The Vickers 1.57 in trench howitzer was based on the Krupp Trench Howitzer (the first toffee apple mortar)"
However, in Weapons of the Trench War there is the enclosed pic described by Anthony Saunders thus: "An artist's impression of a German heavy mortar dating from early 1915. Although the mounting is more or less accurate the barrel is pure fantasy and German mortars never fired toffee-apples."
It's fairly close to the Japanese model, and opinion on The Great War Forum is clearly not in his favour as regards toffee apples.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Although Anthony Saunders is pretty good on many things he's on shaky ground there. There are photos of the Krupp Trench Howitzer (see for example Mortars by Ian Hogg) and it most certainly fired a toffee apple type round. His artists impression is not of a heavy mortar but of the Krupp T H of 1912 - some artists and editors misled (deliberately ?) readers on the scale of the thing and I have a book from 1915 that shows it captioned as "A giant mortar intended to destroy cities"! I have also seen an eye witness account of some one on the receiving end and they are certainly toffee apples. The Krupp T H was turned down by the German Army in 1912 (they did not envisiage a future war as involving trenches very much) and was offered commercially. From their experience of their war with Russia the Japanese may have been more trench minded. The German army changed its mind in 1914 and began buying the mortar. It proved itself a dangerous pest in early 1915 stimulating many requests for something with which to retaliate. Although the Krupp TH fired a much bigger round than either the Vickers TH or the 2 inch mortar its range was shorter and it seems to have been replaced by more effective (and conventional) trench mortars sometime in 1915