A most interesting chap. IIRC he complained bitterly after the War that his armoured car was far superior to the Tanks that were employed and that the conflict would have been over much sooner if his vehicle had been used instead.
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Some editions of GBM have carried articles specifically on French armoured cars. Available from Histoire et Collections.
M. Archer's armoured car is often included in accounts of early French Tank experiments because it was intended as (or M Archer claimed it was) an off-road vehicle. He also had the right idea to some extent in that he recognised the value of high-trajectory fire in trench warfare and so designed it to carry a mortar or howitzer. But it couldn't operate on broken gound and was equipped with bridging girders for trench crossing.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Some editions of GBM have carried articles specifically on French armoured cars. Available from Histoire et Collections.
That's right - there is a great, 3-part article on French armoured cars of the Great War in issues 90, 91 and 93. Unfortunately I don't know French, but photos and illustrations are superb. Generally GBM is probably the best military magazine I've ever seen, I dream of a version in English.
I agree that there is a lack of good, detailed book in English describing WW1 French armoured cars and their use. Maybe Osprey will publish such a book some day?