Apparently on the subject of the Livens Large Gallery Flame Projector. A new one on me, but it seems not to be entirely unknown. The trailer for the prog made it look v. exciting. However, as we have learned, such promise is not always fulfilled.
-- Edited by James H on Tuesday 12th of April 2011 10:57:04 PM
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Excellent. Good to see an interest being taken in it.
My take on it is this. The Livens Large Gallery Flame Projector is not entirely unknown but unlike many of Livens' inventions it was neither simple nor cheap and it hadn't the advantage of "redundancy" - those things were massive, complex, vulnerable to disruption and of short range - taken in combination, the seeds of its obscurity.
"The weapons were the 56ft long, weighed 2.5 tonnes,took 300 men to assemble and were operated by a crew of eight." They were easily destroyed and they were static - and like any "shock and awe" device (and/or tactic) they only work once when deployed against seasoned troops.
Boffins keep forgetting how resilient people (opposition) can be when they are not instantly annihilated or grievously incapacitated and are left with options. But they are adorable when they persist in looking for comparatively non-lethal solutions. There's more than 600 million years worth of selection and evolution backing up the resilience of the fighting man (or "person" as I suppose one should say these days), a few centuries (or even millennia) of "civilisation" and soft living count for somewhere between nothing and little in comparison.
But the projector was terribly impressive in operation by all accounts and was suitably scary and worked well enough be worth trying - and the lessons learned defined and focussed the development of more effective and deadly weapons and tactics. I'm looking forward very much to the resurrection of this important (and doubtlessly very photogenic) precursor device.
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
I enjoyed it very much. Something I knew nothing about and I thought the programme a very good introduction. Doubtless there's lots more to know but only so much you can put in one programme. The fact they found some substantial parts, and the demonstration of what a replica could do, made this a worthwhile programme IMHO.
No sign of the programme airing in Oz yet, but looking forward to seeing it "sometime". Apparently there was a German equivalent, the "Grof" (Grossflammenwerfer) for use in the WW1 trenches - I can't recall any detail of its deployment in action and don't know if it came before or after Livens' device. The fantastic South African "Blaster" vehicle anti-carjack device is a spiritual descendent but, sadly, its use has not caught on, even in South Africa, though some may remain fitted to cars in the republic according to Wiki. It never seems to have caught on for the defence of fixed fortifications - I suppose the vulnerability and hazard of the pressurised fuel supply negated the close-in protective capability. Ballistic weapons and protective mine emplacements held/hold sway. Mobile flame throwers are another matter but even those seem to be eschewed these days (certainly there's a more "caring" sort of bellicosity about and abroad)