Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Tanks -> 301st Tank Bn. "Baby Doll"
Post Info TOPIC: 301st Tank Bn. "Baby Doll"
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3879
Date:
301st Tank Bn. "Baby Doll"
Permalink   

It seems to have been 9015. I expect there will be good info on the Mk IV chart, which I can't find at the mo.

Update: It's a Mk V. Details, courtesy of Ironsides, at bottom of this thread.

Service details here.



-- Edited by James H on Thursday 12th of April 2012 10:49:27 PM

__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
jagjetta


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Date:
Permalink   

Greetings,

Does anyone know anything about the tank "Baby Doll?" From this photo, it appears that it was a demonstrator in the United States.

I dare say, goggling "301 Baby Doll Tank" does not produce the desired (though, perhaps, distracting) results.

 

Thanks,

JAG



Attachments
__________________

John A-G.
Hudson, WI USA
plastikk


Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 219
Date:
Permalink   

It' Mark IV i hope...well good idea for a ''new toy''.Inspired paints on sponson and gun.
Any decals in close future??

__________________

TankPower 1915-1939...
jagjetta


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Date:
Permalink   

Son of a gun!  THat's where I saw it...ironic thing, the photos Ironsides posted are at the Minnesota Historical Society where my partner was the Curator of Photography for many years before she transferred to historic preservation office!  blankstare

Thank you so much for jogging my memory!



__________________

John A-G.
Hudson, WI USA
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3879
Date:
Permalink   

Jogging? My memory needs jump leads nowadays.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Gwyn Evans


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1414
Date:
Permalink   

The L9 reference on the link is incorrect, that was 9016 which the link also has.

Gwyn

__________________
Valeriy67


Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:
Permalink   

Two more photos.

Β 



Attachments
__________________

Кино, Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ…Π»Π΅Π± - сим побСдиши.
Willem Visser


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 299
Date:
Permalink   

Can anyone explain why there are deadheads/skulls and bones on some of the tanks?

I can not read the text one the fisrt picture (at the start of this subject). Maybe that will clarify?

Hope someone can explain.

Β 

Best regards,

Willem



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Tanks -> 301st Tank Bn. "Baby Doll"
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard