Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: tsar tank


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
tsar tank
Permalink   


Hi
I am trying to find a bit more on the tsar tank

there is only one photo of it, but does anyone have any more photos my references say it was scraped in 1923, there had to be more photos of it!



__________________


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:
Permalink   

Can be eat and more photo, but anybody these photos did not search specially.
Personal archive N.Lebedenko was probably kept.
It after revolution has emigrated, and at least up to 1943 was alive.



To me only 2 photos are known
And one figure. And in different technics of execution.

Interestingly - several years ago have found details from tsar-tank - a small tower and still what that elements of a design on a place of its "parking"

-- Edited by Stoyan at 06:18, 2005-12-18

-- Edited by Stoyan at 06:18, 2005-12-18

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Nice one Stoyan, I knew you'd turn up trumps on this one!

__________________


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 926
Date:
Permalink   

Question???? Does any body no if there was different versions of the Tzar Tank, or did this artist just draw this picture to represent a artist impression??


Becouse this drawing's top turrett is way off compared to the pictures we have of the built monstrosity. Any Idea's????


Also I have included a picture of a 1/48th scale Tzar Tank you can download from the net. Its very simple to built, and it has some very good detail, not usually offered in paper models.


All The Best


Tim R.



Attachments
tzar0.jpg (34.0 kb)
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal"
-Cicero 106-43BC


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink   

is there any primary documents on it still in existance

__________________


Sergeant

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:
Permalink   

As the nobility... Can be...

Your file TSAR.pdf (895422 Bytes) is now online.
Your Download-Link:http://rapidshare.de/files/9370035/TSAR.pdf.html

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink   

thanks


__________________


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 134
Date:
Permalink   

Howdy fellas,

Tim, where did you say you can download that paper model of the Tsar?

Tread.

__________________
"....You're a better man than I, Gunga Din..."


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

My own drawing based on the info in Steve Zalogas book on Soviet Armour looks so


 


<img src="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-11/1114252/tsart.jpg">


I actually draw in vector (for ease of scaling) so this might be better



-- Edited by Centurion at 18:06, 2005-12-18

-- Edited by Centurion at 18:07, 2005-12-18

-- Edited by Centurion at 18:09, 2005-12-18

-- Edited by Centurion at 18:09, 2005-12-18

Attachments
tsart.ppt (72.0 kb)
__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 926
Date:
Permalink   

Here is the web address Robert, It builds into a fine model.


http://home.1asphost.com/homespunmagixx/tzartank/tzar_download.asp


All the Best


Tim R.



__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal"
-Cicero 106-43BC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

Tim R wrote:


Here is the web address Robert, It builds into a fine model. http://home.1asphost.com/homespunmagixx/tzartank/tzar_download.asp All the Best Tim R.

Thanks Tim but I thinkmit was Treadhead who wanted the download. I'm amite dubious about it as it does not match the propportions in the photograph in Zaloga and Grandsens book which is probably the best of the shots I've sen of the beast.

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Hero

Status: Offline
Posts: 926
Date:
Permalink   

Sorry Robert, Again I am at work and trying to keep up and work at the smae time.


 {Even if its not 100% it still makes a fine model.}


All the Best


Tim R.



__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal"
-Cicero 106-43BC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

I found the following article in Pravda of all places. It gives a bit of background on the Tsar Tank including details of its first trial run. It also has some details of some looney ideas including at least one British one for a real landship I think its that phatom naval major again - anybody know any more?


"



Russian Monstrous Giant Tanks of WWI

04/12/2003 15:13


Russian engineers used to design unimaginable arms


WWI reanimated the idea of the Middle Ages. The idea was based on a simple fact: it is easier to hold the line than to attack. An attacking side needs protection. There were armored vehicles invented for that purpose, but they were useless on bad roads. The passability of a wheel directly depends on its diameter, so engineers decided to make huge wheels for armored vehicles. This idea first occurred to Captain Nikolay Lebedenko, the head of the Moscow military and technical laboratory.


Nikolay Lebedenko suggested the project of a very unusual military vehicle in May of 1915. It was an armored vehicle with huge wheels, which looked like a gun-carriage. Engineers Boris Stechkin and Alexander Mikulin (they later became famous Russian academicians) started working on the project.


Mikulin remembers: “Nikolay Lebedenko invited me to come to his office, he locked the door and whispered to my ear: "Professor Nikolay Zhukovsky referred you as a skilful engineer. Do you agree to work on the project of the machine that I invented? Such machines will help to break through the whole German front just within one night, and Russia will win the war."


It is worth mentioning that Lebedenko was not the only person, who suggested a project of an armored vehicle with huge wheels. However, it was Nikolay Lebedenko, who managed to realize his project in real life. The wheels of his vehicle were nine meters in diameter. The machine weighed about 40 tons, it was nine meters high, 17 meters long and 12 meters wide. Yet, the machine was not equipped with guns, for the Central Artillery Department provided guns only for the projects, that were considered ready for  practical usage.


The machine was tested in August of 1917. It moved, broke an old big birch-tree on its way and got stuck in the ground with its rear roller. Another test took place in 1918, but it was not a success either. Nikolay Lebedenko's further fate is not known. Like a lot of other people, he vanished in the turmoil of post-revolutionary events in Russia. Academician Boris Stechkin thinks that Lebedenko probably died. Lebedenko's machine was called the Tsar-Tank. It did not take an honorable place next to the Tsar-Bell or the Tsar-Cannon. The Tsar-Tank rusted in the woods, until it was dismantled in 1923. That was the end of the inglorious history of the first Russian self-propelled armored vehicle.


Such unlucky inventors as Nikolay Lebedenky became a real disaster for Russian military men in the beginning of the 20th century. There were  too many projects of wonder arms. For example, an engineer offered to use boiler metal for producing rolls of six meters in diameter, which would be tens of meters long. As an inventor thought, soldiers could roll those rollers in front of them. Rollers were also supposed to be outfitted with machine-guns at its ends. The inventor wrote all that in a letter, which was completed with a touchy request – "Please, let me know, if there anything else that I can invent to fight the enemy." However, the engineer did not specify the way, how soldiers were supposed to turn those huge rollers or roll them up on hills.


Those so-called inventors could not boast of their engineering knowledge, although experienced engineers suggested unreal monsters sometimes too. For instance, there was an interesting project of an "upgraded tortoise," which was suggested by engineer Navrotsky. The machine was supposed to weigh 192 tons, to move with the help of three rolls and to have an unimaginable complex of ordnance – 16 guns and ten machine-guns.


European engineers also dreamed of designing such movable fortresses. Major of the Royal Naval Aviation Service Hetterington projected a "land cruiser" in the beginning of  1915. The British defense monster was supposed to have three wheels of 12 meters in diameter, six guns and 12 machine-guns. The project was considered at the committee for land cruisers: the mass of the giant cruiser made up one thousand tons. The director of the ship-building department refused from building such a monster.


A certain time later, British designers liked the caterpillar ordnance idea, which pushed huge wheels into the background, and resulted in the invention of a caterpillar tank. Winston Churchill was one of proponents of the novelty. A new model of an English tank was named after him during WWII. However, the invention of caterpillar tanks did not stop Russian engineers from designing something new and extraordinary. In 1928, a Russian engineer  recommended the Russian military command to subdue the enemy with the help of a self-propelled two-wheeled vehicle. The diameter of its wheels was 12 meters. Yet, the whole project was briefly described on several sheets of paper, which did not allow to get to essence of it.


The success of caterpillar tanks reduced the interest to big-wheeled armored vehicles. Yet, the idea of a big wheel still excited engineers' minds even  in WWII. The German company Krupp got back to the old idea in 1944 and constructed a 40-ton armored self-propelled vehicle. Its wheels were 2,5 meters in diameter. There was only one vehicle like that built, though. It is currently exhibited in a defense technology museum in the Moscow region.


On the photo: Russian wheeled tank, as designed by Nikolay
Lebedenko.



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

Solved - it was the big British wheel.


‘land battleship’, brainchild of Flight-Commander T G Hetherington of the RNAS, who had convinced Churchill of the feasibility of a machine that was to comprise a platform mounted on three, forty-foot diameter wheels, two in front with the steering wheel behind. Its three turrets were each to be equipped with two four-inch naval guns and the whole contraption propelled by an 800 horsepower Sunbeam submarine diesel engine. Top speed was eight miles per hour and the whole weight a staggering 300 tons. Not surprisingly, work on this behemoth never progressed beyond the mock-up stage; even a fifteen-foot diameter wheel was considered too cumbersome and also too easy a target for enemy artillery.


 



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Excellent article, Robert.


As for it being the British big wheel, I think it was just a case of parallel development. Big wheels were a pretty obvious solution to the problem of crossing trenches (look at the patent drawing Tim Rigsby posted elsewhere here). Hetherington's proposal was never very concrete, but mainly I very much I doubt a Russian engineer would have heard about it.


Ironically, Hetherington's idea grew out of a riposte to Macfie's proposal to replace armoured cars with 'fighting tracklayers', which he had been trying to persuade the War Office to look at and getting nowhere. Subsequently, Macfie turned to a Lt Harry Delacombe who earlier in October 1914 had been working with Murray Sueter (another relevant name) on balloons. Whilst Sueter was away in Antwerp with Churchill (another relevant name etc.), Delacombe sounded out Macfie's idea with some fellow officers, one of them being Hetherington. Unimpressed, as were they all, Hetherington said, 'If you are going in for a landship on those lines why not go the whole hog and take a thing like the gasometer at the Oval and armour it, put on a couple of wheels like the Earls Court Wheel, put your mechanism inside and put in some decent guns like 12in. naval guns, then you can cross the Rhine.'


For an idea of scale the ferris wheel at Earls Court (long gone) was a hundred feet across. It's pretty clear from this (taking familiar objects anyone would have known) that the whole thing was one of those 'pub proposals', the sort of thing one comes up with over a drink. Of course, Hetherington took it deadly seriously, and that initial idea evolved into the landship you describe. Tennyson d'Eyncourt looked at the later proposal and felt three hundred tons was a gross underestimate, eight hundred would have been nearer the mark, which indicates the fantastic nature of the scheme.



-- Edited by Roger Todd at 21:21, 2005-12-21

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 498
Date:
Permalink   

rusted in the woods, I can imagine a hiker discovering sucvh mosnter in soem open field

I am going to contact the russian archives and see if the yahve more photos of the tank I am greatly intigued by it!
two trials 1917-1918, then stood fro mabotu 5-6 years more than one photo of it had to be taken

il let you know if my I find anything

now does anyone one know how should I contact in the russian archives?

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

Roger _ I'm with you on most of this but I understand that Hetherington had Churchills ear for a time (but had to give it back) and the Landship Committee (probably most reluctantly) had to do some design studies on the idea and mock up the wheel (well at least one of them).

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink   

Everybody had Churchill's ear at some point...!


The Hetherington Proposal, as it was known, was a product of late 1914 (November) and fizzled in the new year of 1915, and so predates the Landships Committee. However, some RNAS armoured car men were detailed to look into it. The connection with Churchill is that he was hassling Sueter for a war-winning super-weapon, and Hetherington was reporting to Sueter. Sueter put the RNAS engineers onto it, and they soon pronounced it impractical, at which point Sueter knocked it on the head.


The mock-up you're probably thinking of was a rough wooden one of the Tritton Big Wheeler (the four-wheeled machine which features in another thread), and which was much later (don't forget, most of the tank pioneers started as Big Wheel men).


EDIT: Actually, I've just looked up more details - Sueter showed Hetherington's proposal to Churchill at the end of January 1915, who then showed it to the legendary Jackie Fisher. He, in turn, showed it to Admiral Percy Scott (the celebrated gunnery expert) who thought the idea flawed - too big, vulnerable to artillery, etc. Sueter, who had little confidence in Hetherington's Big Wheel, was happy to drop the idea. But Churchill persisted, and met Hetherington at a dinner party thrown by the Duke of Westminster in February 1915. Churchill was again fired up with enthusiasm for it, and in the next day or so showed the plans to d'Eyncourt (his DNC) who was rather taken aback and stalled for time (one rather gets the impression that from the start d'Eyncourt thought the idea preposterous). It's more or less from this time that d'Eyncourt is, unwittingly at first, drawn into the landships project. Sueter, meanwhile, was annoyed when he heard about the dinner (from which he had been deliberately excluded) and moved to show Churchill his idea for a pedrail tracked landship (see the pedrail thread) and arrange a demonstration for Chuchill of a peculiar little hand-pushed pedrail cart.



-- Edited by Roger Todd at 22:22, 2005-12-21

__________________


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 456
Date:
Permalink   

Centurion!


I will use your post in entirety in the article on the Tsar Tank, ok? (Of course giving you full credits.) If not, please yell.


 



__________________
/Peter Kempf


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink   

Peter Kempf wrote:


Centurion! I will use your post in entirety in the article on the Tsar Tank, ok? (Of course giving you full credits.) If not, please yell.  

As I said in my original post I took this fro Pravda to whom any credit should be given.

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Private

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Permalink   

is it still avaliable any where ?confuse



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
Date:
Permalink   

The Landships Article?  Yes, look for Lebedenko under Russian "Tank Articles"

http://www.landships.info/landships/tank_articles.html#

or, on the old Landships site

http://www.landships.freeservers.com/lebedenko_info.htm

The model? Others may know.



-- Edited by Rectalgia on Saturday 3rd of September 2011 06:00:12 AM

__________________
Facimus et Frangimus
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard