Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Some FT17s went a long way


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Some FT17s went a long way
Permalink Closed


See the link to details of two FT17s recently found in Afghanistan


http://defendamerica.mil/articles/feb2003/a022703b.html



-- Edited by Centurion at 21:11, 2006-01-04

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 53
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yeah, both of those vehicles are now at the Patton Museum here in Kentucky, and at least one of them is going to be fully restored. A restored turret from one of them is already in the museum, sans a few fittings, and they have their "regular" FT opened up so the curator and restoration crew can see what the restored vehicle is supposed to look like. Neat! I can't wait!
Matt

__________________

“[B]ut these tanks are machines, their caterpillars run on as endless as the war, they are annihilation, they roll without feeling into the craters, and climb up again without stopping..." -Erich Maria Remarque

 



Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink Closed

As far as I know, Afghanistan was not one of the countries that officially took delivery of these tanks, however Iran did take delivery of a company (25 vehicles) of these light tanks in 1924 and it is therefore possible that they passed some of them on to Afghanistan in the 1930s. I had seen something at least a year ago about this incredible find (as an aside to show how old stuff just shows up in the weirdest places, when I was in Somalia back in 1988 and 1989, there were the rusting hulks of an M-5 light tank or an M-8 75mm howitzer motor carriage (ex-Saudi?) and an old Staghound armored car.) I believe an FT-17 was once at the Army Museum in Kabul (?). The Afghans are known to have had some improvised American built "Disston" tanks as well as some Italian CV-33 tankettes during the 1930s.

__________________
Wesley Thomas


Field Marshal

Status: Offline
Posts: 456
Date:
Permalink Closed

When I was in Bosnia in 94 I saw several WW2-era AFV's rolling about, including T-34's and an Achilles Tank Destroyer, in full use! An artillery piece isn't older than the barrel, and really old ones can be put to fairly good use, but one cannot but pity - and amire - the guys keeping a 50 year old tank in fighting condition...


 



__________________
/Peter Kempf


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

SASH155 wrote:



Afghans are known to have had some improvised American built "Disston" tanks


One has recently been photograohed in a Kabul scrapyard. Actually its not quite accurate to call these improvised. Disston sold kits specially designed to convert tracked tractors into tanks (of dubious use). Not much of a step from the early Holt and Best efforts in 1916/17. The idea was copied in both Australia and New Zealand circa 1940 (the latter being known as the Bob Semple after the then minister of defence) and possibly in Canada. These were effectively improvisations. One contemporary military assesment of the Bob Semple tanks was that a couple of Bren carriers would have been of more value.

-- Edited by Centurion at 12:30, 2006-01-05

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 64
Date:
Permalink Closed

It's also possible that the FT-17s were supplied by the Soviet Union. Afghanistan signed a treaty of friendship with the new Soviet Union in 1921 and various other treaties afterwards. At least some arms were supplied by Moscow during the 20s and 30s, and this may have included the FT-17s.

__________________


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink Closed

I looked at the photos in one of my books that were taken in Afghanistan by Steve Zaloga at the museum back pre-Taliban (1989 or 1990), but it does not show any FT-17s, contrary to my prior statements. I suppose the Soviet path is one of the most logical ones for these tanks. Perhaps someone could weigh in with the definitive answer on where the Afghans acquired these tanks. I am very interested in arms exports world wide throughout history (besides, current international arms sales and international military equipment inventories are part of my job). 

__________________
Wesley Thomas


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 64
Date:
Permalink Closed

A shot of the FT-17 preserved outside an army barracks in Kabul appeared in David Isby's book for Concord on the Soviet war in Afghanistan. At the time, the story was that it was a trophy of the 1919 3rd Afghan War against Britain. This version also appears in Andrew Kirk's Tanks! site


http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/afghanistan/afghanistan.html


I was never convinced by this, as the RTC didn't send any tanks to India until the 20s, never mind the very limited British use of the FT-17 overall.


The preserved Disston tank also appears on the same page.


The Soviet connection was suggested to me by Charles Lemons of the Patton Museum, when he sent me a couple of pictures of the recovery of the FT-17s. Sadly the photos went west with my previous PC.



-- Edited by Drader at 09:40, 2006-01-06

__________________


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 64
Date:
Permalink Closed

A bit of trawling found these pictures of the Afghan FT-17s under restoration


http://svsm.org/gallery/ft-17


The same site has a few shots of the Kubinka Mark V Hermaphrodite



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

Drader wrote:



A shot of the FT-17 preserved outside an army barracks in Kabul appeared in David Isby's book for Concord on the Soviet war in Afghanistan. At the time, the story was that it was a trophy of the 1919 3rd Afghan War against Britain. This version also appears in Andrew Kirk's Tanks! site http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/afghanistan/afghanistan.html I was never convinced by this, as the RTC didn't send any tanks to India until the 20s, never mind the very limited British use of the FT-17 overall. The preserved Disston tank also appears on the same page. The Soviet connection was suggested to me by Charles Lemons of the Patton Museum, when he sent me a couple of pictures of the recovery of the FT-17s. Sadly the photos went west with my previous PC. -- Edited by Drader at 09:40, 2006-01-06



I share your reservations however I have a memory of seeing somewhere that some Whippets were actually used in the 3rd Afghan war. These wouldn't have to be RTC as the Indian army did aquire AFVs in its own right. I'll try and track it down but no promises.


The Diston tank appeared in a phot on Missing Lynx last year - very definitely in a scrap yard. Sometime during the Taliban regime it would seem someone dumped all the old tanks from the museum - perhaps they thought there was something non Islamic about them?



-- Edited by Centurion at 13:39, 2006-01-06

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 64
Date:
Permalink Closed

Looks like the ML pictures have expired.


These ones haven't


http://www.afvnews.ca/cgi-bin/web-bbs/webbbs_config.pl/read/68573#68573


and the thread suggests that there is more than one



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

This web site contains an interesting section on the FT17s in Afghanistan - it suggests that there were at least four, two in much better condition than those taken to the US.


http://www.4600n200e.com/index2.html



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 64
Date:
Permalink Closed

At last a picture of the one in Kabul!


And one more for the survivors list


The comment about FT-17s being rare is amusing, I've found over two dozen survivors so far...



__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

Digging around some more I find two seperate references to one of the Afghan FT17s being used to confront the Soviet invaders in 1979 and one (that on the face of it sounds insane) that an FT17 was captured by British forces  during the 1919 war. If the lattter was true where the bleep did the Afghans get it from?

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink Closed

Some have speculated that the tanks were actually Fiat 3000s, but after examining the photos I conclude that they are the real McCoys from any one of the four original builders (Renault of course, Berliet, Delaunay-Belleville or SOMUA). It is perfectly possible that France exported these tanks to the Afghans as they exported thousands of weapons of various types to many countries during the war and post war. I find from time to time that certain countries had a particular type of French weapon post WW1 that does not show up in the current analysis and lists of country weapons inventories. The French have always been prolific arms dealers. 



__________________
Wesley Thomas


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

SASH155 wrote:


Some have speculated that the tanks were actually Fiat 3000s, but after examining the photos I conclude that they are the real McCoys from any one of the four original builders (Renault of course, Berliet, Delaunay-Belleville or SOMUA). It is perfectly possible that France exported these tanks to the Afghans as they exported thousands of weapons of various types to many countries during the war and post war. I find from time to time that certain countries had a particular type of French weapon post WW1 that does not show up in the current analysis and lists of country weapons inventories. The French have always been prolific arms dealers. 

There was also trade in second hand FT17s - for example Poland sold off an number of her Renaults. Did Persia (Iran) ever have any FT17s?

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
That 'captured' tank
Permalink Closed


The myth, now repeated across so many web sites, that one (or more) of the FT17s found recently in Afghanistan was captured from the British in the 1919 war can be laid to rest. In fact the only tank that the Afghans captured from the British was the small town of Tank on the North West Frontier(yes there really is a town there called Tank) when the Afghan army first invaded. It was soon recaptured (hence another erroneous report that the briish had captured a tank from the Afghans). The British used no tanks in this campaign and had no Renault FTs in India at all. I mentioned that I had seen a report that Whippets were used. I've run this one down too. There is circulating a photo taken in the Khyber pass that proports to be a British Whippet tank. In fact it is a Lloyd carrier from the 30s! Where ever the Renaults came from it must have been later (possibly aquired by one of the sides in the 1929 Afghan civil war - its never exactly been the most peaceful spot on the globe).

__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
RE: Some FT17s went a long way
Permalink Closed


See this quote from one of the earlier entries: "Iran did take delivery of a company (around 25 vehicles) of these light tanks in 1924" from France. I hope that this answers the question, the source was Steven J. Zaloga himself. 

__________________
Wesley Thomas


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink Closed

First, I would love to see that museum! As for their prohibition on photo taking its a typical third world dictatorship's attempt to keep control of everything and maintain absurd levels of secrecy even for stuff that is really old. By the way, and I know this is not relevant to the Great War at all, but do you know your modern US armor fairly well? If so can you tell me if there was an M-48 medium tank at that museum, and if so what variant was it? I have read that they had the original gasoline powered, 90mm gun M-48 from 1953-1954 (before the useless enclosed commander's cupola) and then between 1970 and 1972 they modified them all locally directly to the M-48A5 standard (with the 105mm M-68 main gun, diesel AVDS-1790 engine, new FCS) without having used any of the interim versions ie: M-48A1, M-48A2 or the M-48A3. I speculate that there may have been some confusion between the later versions of the M-48 and the M-47M, a modernized M-47 medium tank, as the intelligence entries sometimes said M-47/48, with a number of vehicles that approximates the number of M-47s the Iranians once had. Perhaps they never had M-48s at all; I have never seen a photo of an Iranian M-48 and earlier (especially mid 1970s) reports fail to mention it in their inventory, however I have seen plenty of photos of Iranian M-60A1s, M-47Ms and Chieftains. 

-- Edited by SASH155 at 07:22, 2006-01-11

__________________
Wesley Thomas


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1393
Date:
Permalink Closed

SASH155 wrote:



As for their prohibition on photo taking its a typical third world dictatorship's attempt to keep control of everything and maintain absurd levels of secrecy even for stuff that is really old.


Curse those mad dictatorial mullahs! They must be running the Greenwich Obervatory Museum in London now, because when I was there a few months ago I wasn't allowed to take any photographs. Ah well, that's subcontracting for you...

-- Edited by Roger Todd at 16:40, 2006-01-11

__________________


Lieutenant

Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Date:
Permalink Closed

@Sash


Good that you ask about the M-48...Well... Okay I'll tell the whole thing.


Inside Tehran there is a huge Park with several palaces of the Shahs, named Sad Abaad. And inside each Palace there are different Museums. One is about Cryptology, one about Agriculture, one about Poets, arts, etc.


And of course the Military Museum. It is accessable through a way wich (of course...) is controlled by an extra Military Checkpoint ,with some rather lazy and friendly soldiers BTW,thet told us that it is strictly forbidden to take any pictures.


The First things you see are the First Shahs Rolls Royce in an Vitrine and and American Helicopter used in the Iran-Iraq war wich shot down several Iraqis.


Outside the Museum, they display the Tanks, Armoured vehicles and Artillery (aswell as Planes and Helicopters... Among them a Fieseler and Storch). On the Frontside you can find The Pre- 1945 tanks (among them 3 Shermans, 2 Czech Skoda 35(t) and 38(t), T34, 2 Armoured Cars (wich I couldn't identify, but probably from WW1 or the 20's-30's), and several other mainly US Halftracks, and one vehicle that seemed to be a Converted German WW2 Krupp Protze.


The Artillery ,displayed on the frontside, reaches from Crimean War Artillery to the 1960's. Most are 1912-18 manufactured, with the majority from Russia.Also French 75mm Guns, British 13/18 pdr and some Howitzers (probably left in Iran after the British occupation in WW1). Also a German WW2 Flak, and of course loads of US and Soviet WW2 Artillery.


And now the part interesting to you. On the backside of the Museum they display many more tanks, All of them from 1945-88. But you probably guessed it... Two moronic looking gorillas in Uniform and Kalashnikovs walk towards me and say that this part of the museum is not accessible and that we should keep distance. I could recognize a T72, a T54 and a US M60... I guess that the M48 you asked for might be among them, but I had no chance to see them. AFAIK Iran still uses several hundreds of US Patton tanks, and also of course T54-72.


Inside the Museum we (4 persons) encountered not a single visitor, but 10 armed soldiers. When you walk throught the Museum you will first pass a chronological Vitirne display of the Iranian Military Uniforms, from Ancient Persian warriors, Persian medival body armor, to 1930-40 Uniform and finally an Iranian 1982 Soldier Uniform display wich looks exactly like an 1942 US Soldier.


The Two story building has in it's basement mainly ancient Swords, shields, daggers, armor, bows and Arrows, followed by MANY MANY gorgeous Rifles from 16th-19th Century. One curiousity is a cannon mounted and operated from Camel back! 


Then you enter a special section with Personal Weapons and Awards of the Royalty wich consisted mostly of Weapons donated from US, Israeli or Turkish State Guests, Officials and Military Personell.


Then , walking upstairs, FINALLY the Most interesting Section covering WW1-WW2. You will find 6 greatly preserved Austrian Schwarzlose, German MG08 and Russian Maxim Machine Guns, followed by British Vickers and French Hotchkiss and Chauchat MG's. Also some Mortars wich seemed to be Russian. Also there were Uniforms displayed with Fur and Field Caps but also German and Austrian M17-M18 Steelhelmets and later US M1 and Soviet Helmets.


Then of course lot's of Persian Mauser Rifles and Lugers and several C96's. This section for WW1-WW2 Infantry section lasts till the end, where you have to walk downstairs and pass again two unfriendly soldiers. When we were at the Entrance to leave, I wanted to watch again more closely a displayed Imperial Iranian Officers uniform from 1943 wich was only 2 meters away, but the soldiers turned mad and yelled at me to go away and that it's impossible to enter the museum twice! Then they even called an Officer who argued with us to leave the Museum (for wich we paid of course)! Finally they gave in and let me wath this darn Uniform but only accompanied by two guards!


Well all in all an really interesting and well made museum but led by the same morons that ruined the country.



-- Edited by Doggowitz at 21:03, 2006-01-13

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

Doggowitz


I'm envious of your visit to the museum but I'm also afraid that the morons are universal, I was once unable to get photographs of an early military flying boat (C 1913) in a Portugese museum. The French tank museum at Samur had similar restrictions but if you visited on a cold rainy windy day none of the goons could be bothered to turn out from their nice warm guard hut to enforce the rules (you could probably have driven out in a FT17). Back just before the 1st Gulf War part of Babylon was off limits to foreign visitors (although as I learnt later this may have been because Sadam had concealed some military installations behind one of  the ancient monuments, propbably reckoning that their proximity might protect them from attack (he was wrong about that).



__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Major

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink Closed

Like I said, this type of secrecy at all costs (reminds me of a certain president who will remain un-named) makes you look silly at the very least or that you have something that you desperately want to hide. Is'nt it great that the Iranians have museums in which entire sections are closed to the public and where no-one visits, because they fear that they just might get shot by G-3/AK wielding 'curators'?

-- Edited by SASH155 at 19:49, 2006-01-14

__________________
Wesley Thomas


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 150
Date:
Permalink Closed

Time for an update on the FT-17s, er FT-18s!

http://www.armorfortheages.com/Ft18page.htm

__________________


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks for the update, Runflat. Those pictures are just great.

Are you connected with the restoration in any way? Do you know if either of these, er, FT 18 tanks could ever be a runner again? Their engines look in good enough shape. And are they on show to the public, or are there plans to do so? Lot of questions, sorry!

Well, thanks again for the update.

__________________
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.


Lieutenant-Colonel

Status: Offline
Posts: 150
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sorry no connection.  I don't know anything beyond what is in the link.

__________________
James H

Date:
Permalink Closed

Have received this message from Garry Redmon at the Museum. New pictures now up.

The FT17 (Berliet) has now been reassembled, painted and placed in the World War I exhibit hall in the museum. I will post photos of the finished piece in the next few days. I will also amend the information about where they came from.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard