Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Tanks -> A U.S Mark I tank?
Post Info TOPIC: A U.S Mark I tank?
CharlieC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2326
Date:
A U.S Mark I tank?
Permalink   

As part of the researh on the U.S. SPGs, I noticed the following in the book suggested by "Ironsides" - "The Armies of Industry"

written by Benedict Crowell who was Assistant Secretary of War and Director of Munitions 1917-1920.

"The French Renault not being adapted to American methods of mass production, the ordnance department designers undertook to modify it with practical manufacturing considerations in mind. The result was what was virtually a new tank and one typically American. Our officers regarded it as a distinct improvement on the French machine. It was easier to build; it weighed no more than the French machine, yet cost considerably less; and it was a more powerful fighter, for it carried three men instead of two and mounted two guns, one a machine gun and the other a 37-millimeter gun. In justice to the original Renaults, however, it must be stated that a few of them also carried 37-millimeter guns. We ordered 1,000 of these Mark I tanks, as they were called, but the armistice cut short the manufacturing operation in its infancy." 

I haven't heard of the Mark I before and wonder if anyone has seen images or drawings of it.

Regards,

Charlie



__________________
Ironsides


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Hi Charlie That would be the Ford MKI see "Stuart" by Hunnicut where there are several pics, 1000 were ordered one pilot built... but hes bragging a bit I think  it proved to be unstable when climbing C of G to far to the rear...

 

Cheerssmile



Attachments
__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 
TinCanTadpole


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

In addition to what Ironsides wrote, I think I would be right in saying it was an extended version of the M1918 (3 ton) two-man tank.

__________________
CharlieC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2326
Date:
Permalink   

 

Sounds like another one for Landships II (sigh). The problems with weight distribution seem to be shown in the image posted. There are a couple of roadwheels

at the front off the ground even when the tank is at rest. Crowell says it was a redesign of the Renault tank to suit American production. Looks like some

elements of the Ford 3-ton design were used as well.

Regards,

Charlie 



__________________
PDA


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1496
Date:
Permalink   

I know of this tank as "The Ford 3-Man Tank", and there are one or two threads to be found on this forum using that name. Up until this thread I'd never heard it called the Mark I, but I see the "Tanks" website has both names.



__________________
Pzkpfw-e


Commander in Chief

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
Permalink   

It looks to be a very crude creation, even compared to the FT. Poorly balanced, far too much weight to the rear.

__________________
Ironsides


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1626
Date:
Permalink   

Another Pic from "Development of armored vehicles, volume I tanks (AGF Board no. 2, 1 September 1947)."

 

Cheerssmile



Attachments
__________________

"Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazggimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul"

 
TinCanTadpole


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1062
Date:
Permalink   

Good find, Ironsides. Tank doesn't quite look right without the return rollers in place. Perhaps it could have been sorted out if they had moved the track-frames backwards along the hull, removing the front axle, adding mountings at the back to carry the sprockets and slinging some drive chains in between the old and new sprocket positions (like the French did with some of the attempts to update the FT in the twenties)? Shouldn't have been a massive job to redesign like that, but the Cg would have moved forwards relative to the track contact patch.

__________________
CharlieC


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2326
Date:
Permalink   

 

A criticism of the Mark I tank was the impossibility of adjusting the tension of individual tracks - the whole axle had to be moved. I wonder if the tank was ballasted adequately for the weight

of the guns, crew and ammunition when it was tested.

The document is a good find. I'll have to work through the Landships II articles on U.S. armour and update the data on the tanks - unfortunately on a very long list - any volunteers?

Regards,

Charlie



__________________
James H


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 3885
Date:
Permalink   

Ironsides wrote:

Another Pic from "Development of armored vehicles, volume I tanks (AGF Board no. 2, 1 September 1947)."

 IIRC that's the pic I was referring to here when Tim R enquired about the vehicle. A distressingly long time ago.



__________________

"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Landships II -> Landships WW1 Forum -> Tanks -> A U.S Mark I tank?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard