These were developments of the original CA 2. I believe that the CA 2 had a turret but may not have been completed and the CA 3 had its gun mounted in the same manner as the St Chamond. Neither solved the basic trench crossing problem that made the original ineffective. Does any one have or know a source of illustation of either of these? Photo, drawing or whatever.
Sorry Robert, I looked in all my French sources for the CA2 and CA3, but no photos or drawings, they are mentioned though briefly, but neither of them was built in any quantity as they were prototypes and as a result they did not see service use. In some earlier note I wrote that the 75mm gun used on the Schneider CA1 and the FT-17 'char-canon' tanks was designated 'SB' (sic.) (Schneider-Bourges). In actuality L'Atelier de Bourges had nothing to do with this weapons development or production as far as I know, and the actual designation of BS (an unfortunate moniker in an English context) simply stood for 'Blochaus Schneider'.
Amazing, although it's a bit difficult to make out what they are, are they basically big boxy jobs like the Schneider, with turrets perched on top of what look like very tall hulls?
(did you notice that the fuel tanks are still on top of these tanks? So the French havent corrected that one, there also appears to be some sort of unditching gear on them, which is a good idea
Exactly my reaction. No wonder Estienne intervened and suggested that they abandon the Ca 2 and get on with the Ca 3. One wonders if this was the other ugly sister.
If had of the CA2 trial a video, it still searches. Here the CA-3 as a drawing. Greeting
Thanks - now I can see what it looks like.
Roger. I understand that the French logic was something like ' its got the same trench crossing capacity as the St chamond - which isn't good, and the St chamond has a bigger gun gallic shrug of shoulders why bother'
Roger. I understand that the French logic was something like ' its got the same trench crossing capacity as the St chamond - which isn't good, and the St chamond has a bigger gun gallic shrug of shoulders why bother'
Followed by, "Ah well, we can always get some decent tanks off the perfidious shopkeepers across La Manche..."
That drawing is excellent, Hedi. The turreted vehicle, the CA2, looks incredibly topheavy though. And I think you're right Eugene, those do look like fuel tanks on top - wouldn't want to be in that...
You are right Eugene those are armored fuel tanks, I have been doing some research on the CA2, CA3 and the CA4 for some time know, information seems to be very hard to find, even with my leads in France, has turned up very little information.
I have found a some what questionable CA2 drawing; I have also found the CA3 drawing Hedi has shared with us. But alas nothing on the CA4. I was hoping to do an article on the prototype and paper project Schneider’s in the near future, but unless more information is found, I guess we will have to keep speculating.
All the Best
Tim R.
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal" -Cicero 106-43BC
Whoa! That's some awesome footage! They look just like over-tall copies of the Renault FT. Although the turret on the CA2 (That's the turreted one, right? I'm not sure which is which) looks a lot like that on the later Char 2C. Thanks for the video, Hedi! Matt
__________________
“[B]ut these tanks are machines, their caterpillars run on as endless as the war, they are annihilation, they roll without feeling into the craters, and climb up again without stopping..." -Erich Maria Remarque
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
I can't get into the website to see the video. I keep entering the password but just keep going round in circles. Any ideas?
__________________
"Sometimes things that are not true are included in Wikipedia. While at first glance that may appear like a very great problem for Wikipedia, in reality is it not. In fact, it's a good thing." - Wikipedia.
One exemple of the Schneider CA 2 was built and test in Champlieu in May 1917. This tank was à command tank with a 47 mm gun's turret in the middle. This tank was refused by Général Estienne and send to Marly (Fort du trou d'enfer for instruction). Il was a CA 1 without nose. The end ot this model is not known.
The three tank's photos of this topic are those of a tank only built for the film . . . It's not a Schneider CA.
The project CA 3 was refused in July 1917 by General Estienne, and stop by General Pétain the 8 November 1917. The only reason is the motor's power : the same as CA 1 for 5 tons more. Schneider could not built a powerful motor. 200 chassis of CA 3 was already built and they was used for the command of the artillery's tractors called Schneider CD.
Schneider proposed seven variants of CA 3. The F. Heigl's plans from 1925 is the project S 1058/1059 (variante of project S 1056/1057) The project S 1033 was a model with 75 mm in a front blockhaus. The project S 1050/S 1051 was models with 75 mm model 97 short in turret. For all this project, the motor was in the rear.
For schneider the name of the CA 1 project was S 990.
I am sorry but, about CA 2, it is just the report of the test in Champlieu with a little hand-made sketch. I don't known if some photos were done in Champlieu or in Marly. I never seen, for instance photos of this modèle. . . .
On this little sketch the turret was in the middle of the tank and not in front of the tank like on CA 3 project. This sketch was only there to explain the problems of this model to cross over tranches ans shell's holes.
For the next project (CA3), Heigl's plans is good. The tracks was 370 mm longer than on CA 1.
I don't forgot you and tray to do some good sketches in the next 2 or 3 weeks. . . . If you can to go to Paris. Most important informations on CA 2 ans 3 are in folder 16N2131 in Vincennes. . . but the reading room of SHD will be closed from January 16 th, 2009 to March 16 th, 2009.
Michel Thank you for the information. I am actually planning a trip to France this summer for me and my wifes 15th anniversery. I will try and do some reasearch while we are there. Do you happen to have the project number of the CA2 All the Best Tim R.
__________________
"The life given us by nature is short; but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal" -Cicero 106-43BC
What a very interesting topic, together with the companion topic " Schneider CA 3 : phoney" to be found elsewhere on the forum.
I can only add one point of interest to the Schneider CA 3 obscure history. Its suspension system and track can be seen (I mean, really, not as a movie dummy) on many wartime photographs of another Schneider prototype : the CD 3 full-tracked artillery carrier ('caterpillar porteur' in French).
I do not post photographs here, but I am sure one of the members will do it in a short while: the CD 3 is not well known, but yet not impossible to find. This is by no means a challenge.
The comparison between Heigl's sketch and the photos I am talking of is absolutely convincing.
Unfortunately, the CD 3 is definitely not a tank, but an artillery carrier. It did not see service and remained as a prototype.
I am planning a full article on this vehicle (with the Renault FB caterpillar-porteur, widely used on the front by hundreds) in the next issue of my magazine GBM (sorry, in French only)
To Michel, especially : Bonjour Michel, a great many thanks for your very well documented contributions to this topic. I have sent you a personal message some days ago. Did you receive it ?
Regards
François
-- Edited by françois vauvillier at 16:18, 2009-01-21
-- Edited by françois vauvillier at 16:19, 2009-01-21
Perhaps in a second life, when my english will be better. . . . I am sorry but I have too much topics to do on french tanks, and not enough time. . . . It's very long to write it in english and my technical language is not enough good. May be some members of Landship, speaking a ggod french, will be able to do it in the next months . . .