Landships II

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Popular Science 1938 Prone Driven Two-Man Tankette.


Brigadier

Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Date:
Popular Science 1938 Prone Driven Two-Man Tankette.
Permalink Closed


The subject of the cover story of the July 1938 Popular Science is of "War Machines Go Midget".

It is a two page article.

Covered are an open-top two-man prone-driven "Mobile Machine Gun Nest" tankette, a one-man submarine, a flying armored car with detachable wings and a telescoping turret, a radio-guided 'air-torpedo', and a manned gliding bomb.

More Popular Science madness - but a very good read. Very fun stuff.

Hope you guys enjoy.

P.S.
The article keeps alluding to these vehicles having been "developed". I wonder if any were actually built in prototype or mockup form? Seems doubtful.

EDIT:
Ok... What the hell... I uploaded deliberately large files so that everyone could still read the text. Around 500K images. And yet, the uploaded pictures are 100K and not even legible!!! The stinking upload thing shrunk my images!!! What is going on? And why can this forum not go for a month without some outlandish annoying thing happening to the works?

-- Edited by Vilkata at 04:08, 2006-11-28

Here, I uploaded the pictures. Full size. Should be easier than the stinking file upload service.

Cover:
http://s1.simpload.com/1127456ba9270012f.jpg

Article Page 1:
http://s1.simpload.com/1127456ba961967d2.jpg

Article Page 2:
http://s1.simpload.com/1127456ba989972c9.jpg

-- Edited by Vilkata at 04:15, 2006-11-28

__________________


Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2332
Date:
Permalink Closed

The 2 man mg nest appears to be trying to get the worst of all possible worlds. It has the problems of prone driving (awkward and uncomfortable, limited vision from low down) without the advantages (low profie). What would be the point of the prone position when the gunner sticks up anyway?


The winged tank looks like the last (unbuilt) design in the Westland Petrodactyl series of tailess combat aircraft of the 1930s (most were built and trialed but were much less streamlined and tractors to boot). However I suspect it may be a projection of an American civil design that was built. This was one of many (doomed) attempts to produce a flying car (automobile).


Something like the manned glider bomb was actually built but much later than the article. This was the Messerschmitt 328 that started out as wood built long range 'one way' pulse jet powered escort fighter to accompany (towed) a nuclear armed bomber on a transatlantic raid. Its flight characteristics proved to be dreadful. It was then equiped with a warhead and the pulse jets removed so it could be a glide bomber. originally the pilot was supposed to bail out before impact but this refinement was later abandoned. Volunteers were actually found to fly the beast but it was never deployed operationally.I enclose one of my drawings of this machine.



Attachments
__________________
aka Robert Robinson Always mistrust captions


Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 88
Date:
Permalink Closed

Centurion wrote:



The 2 man mg nest appears to be trying to get the worst of all possible worlds. It has the problems of prone driving (awkward and uncomfortable, limited vision from low down) without the advantages (low profie). What would be the point of the prone position when the gunner sticks up anyway?


The winged tank looks like the last (unbuilt) design in the Westland Petrodactyl series of tailess combat aircraft of the 1930s (most were built and trialed but were much less streamlined and tractors to boot). However I suspect it may be a projection of an American civil design that was built. This was one of many (doomed) attempts to produce a flying car (automobile).


Something like the manned glider bomb was actually built but much later than the article. This was the Messerschmitt 328 that started out as wood built long range 'one way' pulse jet powered escort fighter to accompany (towed) a nuclear armed bomber on a transatlantic raid. Its flight characteristics proved to be dreadful. It was then equiped with a warhead and the pulse jets removed so it could be a glide bomber. originally the pilot was supposed to bail out before impact but this refinement was later abandoned. Volunteers were actually found to fly the beast but it was never deployed operationally.I enclose one of my drawings of this machine.





 


the glider bomb also resembles some of the US made gliding bombs, including those made during WWII, (there were several) but that isnt surprising as the designs of several countrys all resembled one another due to convergent evolution of ideas, they all had similar goals, so they wound up looking similar,


 


and also centruion, popular science and popular mechanics arent exactly known for their acceptance of rational ideas, every other year they talk about how the zepplin is coming back, and how in a few months we will all have flying cars, theyve been saying that since the 30s, oh and one of the flying bombs im talking about was called the bat, it was a us guided bomb used in the pacific from 1944 onward and used a sonar guidance system (hence the name) and had a bit of success, there were also a couple of others tested, some early russian guided weapons designs also look similar to this, (esspecialy the 1940's jet fighters most of which had delta configurations)


an article about the bat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_%28guided_bomb%29


http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/dsh/artifacts/images/RM/A19500104000.jpg


meh looks like it isnt quite as close as i thought.


heres an even better match, the hs 293 antishipping missle:
http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/dsh/artifacts/images/RM/A19840793000d1.jpg

-- Edited by theburk at 04:23, 2006-11-29



-- Edited by theburk at 04:30, 2006-11-29

Attachments
__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard